A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Did Potable Reuse Just Become More Feasible in California?
A recent decision by a California court states that a city's reuse water rates that distribute reuse service costs to all ratepayers ‐ including those who do not receive reuse water ‐ did not comply with the state's Proposition 218, which places requirements on how user fees may be adjusted. Generally, the ruling says that treated‐water customers should not share in the cost of a reuse water system if they are not receiving reuse water. On its face this decision creates a challenge for financing reuse systems by limiting the customer base that is paying for them. On the other hand, it may create an opportunity and a rationale for more fully integrating reuse water across entire systems.
Did Potable Reuse Just Become More Feasible in California?
A recent decision by a California court states that a city's reuse water rates that distribute reuse service costs to all ratepayers ‐ including those who do not receive reuse water ‐ did not comply with the state's Proposition 218, which places requirements on how user fees may be adjusted. Generally, the ruling says that treated‐water customers should not share in the cost of a reuse water system if they are not receiving reuse water. On its face this decision creates a challenge for financing reuse systems by limiting the customer base that is paying for them. On the other hand, it may create an opportunity and a rationale for more fully integrating reuse water across entire systems.
Did Potable Reuse Just Become More Feasible in California?
Lafrance, David (author)
2013-10-01
1 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Indirect Potable Reuse Demonstration at Lake Arrowhead, California
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
|Reverse Osmosis for Direct Potable Reuse in California
Wiley | 2018
|Advanced Research of Potable Reuse in Northern California
TIBKAT | 2018
|Wiley | 2023
|