A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Saltmarsh plant responses to eutrophication
In saltmarsh plant communities, bottom‐up pressure from nutrient enrichment is predicted to increase productivity, alter community structure, decrease biodiversity, and alter ecosystem functioning. Previous work supporting these predictions has been based largely on short‐term, plot‐level (e.g., 1–300 m2) studies, which may miss landscape‐level phenomena that drive ecosystem‐level responses. We implemented an ecosystem‐scale, nine‐year nutrient experiment to examine how saltmarsh plants respond to simulated conditions of coastal eutrophication. Our study differed from previous saltmarsh enrichment studies in that we applied realistic concentrations of nitrate (70–100 μM NO3−), the most common form of coastal nutrient enrichment, via tidal water at the ecosystem scale (~60,000 m2 creeksheds). Our enrichments added a total of 1,700 kg N·creek−1·yr−1, which increased N loading 10‐fold vs. reference creeks (low‐marsh, 171 g N·m−2·yr−1; high‐marsh, 19 g N·m−2·yr−1). Nutrients increased the shoot mass and height of low marsh, tall Spartina alterniflora; however, declines in stem density resulted in no consistent increase in aboveground biomass. High‐marsh plants S. patens and stunted S. alterniflora did not respond consistently to enrichment. Nutrient enrichment did not shift community structure, contrary to the prediction of nutrient‐driven dominance of S. alterniflora and Distichlis spicata over S. patens. Our mild responses may differ from the results of previous studies for a number of reasons. First, the limited response of the high marsh may be explained by loading rates orders of magnitude lower than previous work. Low loading rates in the high marsh reflect infrequent inundation, arguing that inundation patterns must be considered when predicting responses to estuarine eutrophication. Additionally, we applied nitrate instead of the typically used ammonium, which is energetically favored over nitrate for plant uptake. Thus, the form of nitrogen enrichment used, not just N‐load, may be important in predicting plant responses. Overall, our results suggest that when coastal eutrophication is dominated by nitrate and delivered via flooding tidal water, aboveground saltmarsh plant responses may be limited despite moderate‐to‐high water‐column N concentrations. Furthermore, we argue that the methodological limitations of nutrient studies must be considered when using results to inform management decisions about wetlands.
Saltmarsh plant responses to eutrophication
In saltmarsh plant communities, bottom‐up pressure from nutrient enrichment is predicted to increase productivity, alter community structure, decrease biodiversity, and alter ecosystem functioning. Previous work supporting these predictions has been based largely on short‐term, plot‐level (e.g., 1–300 m2) studies, which may miss landscape‐level phenomena that drive ecosystem‐level responses. We implemented an ecosystem‐scale, nine‐year nutrient experiment to examine how saltmarsh plants respond to simulated conditions of coastal eutrophication. Our study differed from previous saltmarsh enrichment studies in that we applied realistic concentrations of nitrate (70–100 μM NO3−), the most common form of coastal nutrient enrichment, via tidal water at the ecosystem scale (~60,000 m2 creeksheds). Our enrichments added a total of 1,700 kg N·creek−1·yr−1, which increased N loading 10‐fold vs. reference creeks (low‐marsh, 171 g N·m−2·yr−1; high‐marsh, 19 g N·m−2·yr−1). Nutrients increased the shoot mass and height of low marsh, tall Spartina alterniflora; however, declines in stem density resulted in no consistent increase in aboveground biomass. High‐marsh plants S. patens and stunted S. alterniflora did not respond consistently to enrichment. Nutrient enrichment did not shift community structure, contrary to the prediction of nutrient‐driven dominance of S. alterniflora and Distichlis spicata over S. patens. Our mild responses may differ from the results of previous studies for a number of reasons. First, the limited response of the high marsh may be explained by loading rates orders of magnitude lower than previous work. Low loading rates in the high marsh reflect infrequent inundation, arguing that inundation patterns must be considered when predicting responses to estuarine eutrophication. Additionally, we applied nitrate instead of the typically used ammonium, which is energetically favored over nitrate for plant uptake. Thus, the form of nitrogen enrichment used, not just N‐load, may be important in predicting plant responses. Overall, our results suggest that when coastal eutrophication is dominated by nitrate and delivered via flooding tidal water, aboveground saltmarsh plant responses may be limited despite moderate‐to‐high water‐column N concentrations. Furthermore, we argue that the methodological limitations of nutrient studies must be considered when using results to inform management decisions about wetlands.
Saltmarsh plant responses to eutrophication
Johnson, David Samuel (author) / Warren, R. Scott (author) / Deegan, Linda A. (author) / Mozdzer, Thomas J. (author)
Ecological Applications ; 26 ; 2649-2661
2016-12-01
13 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Improving Saltmarsh Management in the UK
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
Hydrobiological responses to eutrophication: Volga River reservoirs, Russia
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
Saltmarsh loss and maintenance dredging in estuaries
| British Library Online Contents | 2004
William Fuller and Orlando Saltmarsh. January 19, 1848
| TIBKAT | 1848