A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Economics of Split‐Treatment Water Softening
This article presents three major reasons why split treatment is more economical than single‐stage softening. Aside from the monetary savings from split treatment, a water of more uniform quality can be produced with much less trouble than with either single‐stage softening or split recarbonation. This uniform quality makes it easier to treat the water for other purposes. The article concludes that when a finished water with the minimum total alkalinity is produced and an average of S4 mgd is treated, the annual savings at the Dayton, Ohio, Ottawa St. plant presently amounts to more than $80,000.
Economics of Split‐Treatment Water Softening
This article presents three major reasons why split treatment is more economical than single‐stage softening. Aside from the monetary savings from split treatment, a water of more uniform quality can be produced with much less trouble than with either single‐stage softening or split recarbonation. This uniform quality makes it easier to treat the water for other purposes. The article concludes that when a finished water with the minimum total alkalinity is produced and an average of S4 mgd is treated, the annual savings at the Dayton, Ohio, Ottawa St. plant presently amounts to more than $80,000.
Economics of Split‐Treatment Water Softening
Shuey, Bruce S. (author)
Journal ‐ American Water Works Association ; 58 ; 107-112
1966-01-01
6 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Dayton , Softening , Cost Savings , Ohio
Split‐Treatment Method of Water Softening
Wiley | 1955
|Developments in Split Treatment Water Softening
Wiley | 1944
|Split‐Treatment Water Softening at Dayton
Wiley | 1966
|Wiley | 1936
|Wiley | 1951
|