A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
This article discusses how Georgia's small system peer review program helps alleviate some of the labor and financial burdens, which have been placed on most rural and small systems across the United States as a result of: the complex and increasingly stringent requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act; the reductions in available grant funds; the continuous turnover of employees; poor management practices; and, limited cash flow. The author, himself the superintendent of the Bartow County Water Department in Cartersville, Georgia, demonstrates how the program assists in protecting water resources and how confidentiality works both for and against the program.
This article discusses how Georgia's small system peer review program helps alleviate some of the labor and financial burdens, which have been placed on most rural and small systems across the United States as a result of: the complex and increasingly stringent requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act; the reductions in available grant funds; the continuous turnover of employees; poor management practices; and, limited cash flow. The author, himself the superintendent of the Bartow County Water Department in Cartersville, Georgia, demonstrates how the program assists in protecting water resources and how confidentiality works both for and against the program.
Georgia's Peer Review Program
Camp, Gene (author)
1998-02-01
1 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Georgia's Engineering Guidelines
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1954
|Watershed Dams - Georgia's Solution
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
|Georgia's Evaluation of Spillway Pipes
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
|Round Table Georgia's Curtis Foltz
Online Contents | 2010