A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A laboratory study of the bioremediation of 2,4,6‐trinitrotoluene‐contaminated soil using aerobic/anoxic soil slurry reactor
The successful operation of an aerobic/anoxic laboratory‐scale soil slurry reactor showed that soil contaminated with 2,4,6‐trinitrotoluene (TNT) and hexahydro‐l,3,5‐trinitro‐l,3,5‐triazine (RDX) could be treated in batches or semicontinuously. Batch treatment resulted in the transformation of TNT. Semicontinuous treatment resulted in complete degradation of TNT. In addition to removing TNT, the slurry reactor also removed contaminants such as trinitrobenzene, 2,4‐dinitrotoluene, RDX, and octahydro‐l,3,5,7‐tetranitro‐l,3,5,7‐tetraazocine (HMX). Radiolabeled TNT incubated with reactor biomass showed that 23% of [14C]TNT was mineralized, 27% was converted to biomass, and 8% was adsorbed onto the soil. The rest of the [14C]TNT was accounted for as metabolites, including a ring cleavage product identified as 2,3‐butanediol. Increasing the frequency of soil addition from once to two or three times weekly did not affect the TNT removal rates. The soil slurry reactor also maintained the bacterial population fairly well, needing only 0.3% molasses as a cosubstrate.
A laboratory study of the bioremediation of 2,4,6‐trinitrotoluene‐contaminated soil using aerobic/anoxic soil slurry reactor
The successful operation of an aerobic/anoxic laboratory‐scale soil slurry reactor showed that soil contaminated with 2,4,6‐trinitrotoluene (TNT) and hexahydro‐l,3,5‐trinitro‐l,3,5‐triazine (RDX) could be treated in batches or semicontinuously. Batch treatment resulted in the transformation of TNT. Semicontinuous treatment resulted in complete degradation of TNT. In addition to removing TNT, the slurry reactor also removed contaminants such as trinitrobenzene, 2,4‐dinitrotoluene, RDX, and octahydro‐l,3,5,7‐tetranitro‐l,3,5,7‐tetraazocine (HMX). Radiolabeled TNT incubated with reactor biomass showed that 23% of [14C]TNT was mineralized, 27% was converted to biomass, and 8% was adsorbed onto the soil. The rest of the [14C]TNT was accounted for as metabolites, including a ring cleavage product identified as 2,3‐butanediol. Increasing the frequency of soil addition from once to two or three times weekly did not affect the TNT removal rates. The soil slurry reactor also maintained the bacterial population fairly well, needing only 0.3% molasses as a cosubstrate.
A laboratory study of the bioremediation of 2,4,6‐trinitrotoluene‐contaminated soil using aerobic/anoxic soil slurry reactor
Boopathy, Ramaraj (author) / Manning, John (author) / Kulpa, Charles F. (author)
Water Environment Research ; 70 ; 80-86
1998-01-01
7 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
A Column Study on Phytoremediation of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene(TNT) Contaminated Soil
| British Library Online Contents | 2002
Online Contents | 1999