A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Evaluating the costs of Packed‐Tower Aeration and GAC for Controlling Selected Organics
This article focuses on a preliminary cost analysis that compares liquid‐phase granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment with packed‐tower aeration (PTA) treatment, with and without air emissions control. The sensitivity of cost to design and operating variables is also discussed. For most of the contaminants examined, PTA appears to be more cost‐effective than liquid‐phase GAC, even when vapor‐phase GAC is required in the stripping system.
Evaluating the costs of Packed‐Tower Aeration and GAC for Controlling Selected Organics
This article focuses on a preliminary cost analysis that compares liquid‐phase granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment with packed‐tower aeration (PTA) treatment, with and without air emissions control. The sensitivity of cost to design and operating variables is also discussed. For most of the contaminants examined, PTA appears to be more cost‐effective than liquid‐phase GAC, even when vapor‐phase GAC is required in the stripping system.
Evaluating the costs of Packed‐Tower Aeration and GAC for Controlling Selected Organics
Adams, Jeffrey Q. (author) / Clark, Robert M. (author)
Journal ‐ American Water Works Association ; 83 ; 49-57
1991-01-01
9 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Trihalomethane removal by packed‐tower aeration
| Wiley | 1983
Removing Organics From Groundwater Through Aeration Plus GAC
| Wiley | 1984
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006
Wiley | 1986