A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure mitigation in US residences: in‐home measurements of ventilation control and source control
Measurements were taken in new US residences to assess the extent to which ventilation and source control can mitigate formaldehyde exposure. Increasing ventilation consistently lowered indoor formaldehyde concentrations. However, at a reference air exchange rate of 0.35 h−1, increasing ventilation was up to 60% less effective than would be predicted if the emission rate were constant. This is consistent with formaldehyde emission rates decreasing as air concentrations increase, as observed in chamber studies. In contrast, measurements suggest acetaldehyde emission was independent of ventilation rate. To evaluate the effectiveness of source control, formaldehyde concentrations were measured in Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)‐certified/Indoor airPLUS homes constructed with materials certified to have low emission rates of volatile organic compounds (VOC). At a reference air exchange rate of 0.35 h−1, and adjusting for home age, temperature and relative humidity, formaldehyde concentrations in homes built with low‐VOC materials were 42% lower on average than in reference new homes with conventional building materials. Without adjustment, concentrations were 27% lower in the low‐VOC homes. The mean and standard deviation of formaldehyde concentration was 33 μg/m3 and 22 μg/m3 for low‐VOC homes and 45 μg/m3 and 30 μg/m3 for conventional.
Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure mitigation in US residences: in‐home measurements of ventilation control and source control
Measurements were taken in new US residences to assess the extent to which ventilation and source control can mitigate formaldehyde exposure. Increasing ventilation consistently lowered indoor formaldehyde concentrations. However, at a reference air exchange rate of 0.35 h−1, increasing ventilation was up to 60% less effective than would be predicted if the emission rate were constant. This is consistent with formaldehyde emission rates decreasing as air concentrations increase, as observed in chamber studies. In contrast, measurements suggest acetaldehyde emission was independent of ventilation rate. To evaluate the effectiveness of source control, formaldehyde concentrations were measured in Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)‐certified/Indoor airPLUS homes constructed with materials certified to have low emission rates of volatile organic compounds (VOC). At a reference air exchange rate of 0.35 h−1, and adjusting for home age, temperature and relative humidity, formaldehyde concentrations in homes built with low‐VOC materials were 42% lower on average than in reference new homes with conventional building materials. Without adjustment, concentrations were 27% lower in the low‐VOC homes. The mean and standard deviation of formaldehyde concentration was 33 μg/m3 and 22 μg/m3 for low‐VOC homes and 45 μg/m3 and 30 μg/m3 for conventional.
Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure mitigation in US residences: in‐home measurements of ventilation control and source control
Hult, E. L. (author) / Willem, H. (author) / Price, P. N. (author) / Hotchi, T. (author) / Russell, M. L. (author) / Singer, B. C. (author)
Indoor Air ; 25 ; 523-535
2015-10-01
13 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Engineering Index Backfile | 1896
Exposure Assessment for Formaldehyde and Acetaldehyde in the Workplace
| Online Contents | 2005
A database on formaldehyde concentrations in residences
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000
Airtightness and ventilation strategy in Japanese residences
| Elsevier | 1986