A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Potable use of reclaimed water
Indirect potable reuse is a viable application of reclaimed water if indicated by site‐specific assessments that include contaminant monitoring, health and safety testing, and system reliability evaluation.
The National Research Council released a report in 1998 that evaluated the feasibility of augmenting drinking water supplies with highly treated reclaimed water. The report concluded that indirect potable reuse of reclaimed water (i.e., using reclaimed water to augment a potable water source before treatment) is viable and that direct potable reuse (i.e., introducing reclaimed water directly into a water distribution system) is not viable. Although recent health‐related research has uncovered no adverse effects, such health data are sparse, and the methods for such research are limited. Consequently, the results cannot be extrapolated to potable reuse in general. Thus, each indirect potable reuse project should be implemented only after a thorough, project‐specific assessment of health concerns and measures to mitigate them. Finally, potable reuse should only be considered in communities in which other efforts—water conservation, development of new water sources, and nonpotable reuse—cannot cost‐effectively meet the communities' needs. This article describes the council's recommendations for ensuring the safety of water systems that augment raw water sources with reclaimed water.
Potable use of reclaimed water
Indirect potable reuse is a viable application of reclaimed water if indicated by site‐specific assessments that include contaminant monitoring, health and safety testing, and system reliability evaluation.
The National Research Council released a report in 1998 that evaluated the feasibility of augmenting drinking water supplies with highly treated reclaimed water. The report concluded that indirect potable reuse of reclaimed water (i.e., using reclaimed water to augment a potable water source before treatment) is viable and that direct potable reuse (i.e., introducing reclaimed water directly into a water distribution system) is not viable. Although recent health‐related research has uncovered no adverse effects, such health data are sparse, and the methods for such research are limited. Consequently, the results cannot be extrapolated to potable reuse in general. Thus, each indirect potable reuse project should be implemented only after a thorough, project‐specific assessment of health concerns and measures to mitigate them. Finally, potable reuse should only be considered in communities in which other efforts—water conservation, development of new water sources, and nonpotable reuse—cannot cost‐effectively meet the communities' needs. This article describes the council's recommendations for ensuring the safety of water systems that augment raw water sources with reclaimed water.
Potable use of reclaimed water
Crook, James (author) / MacDonald, Jacqueline A. (author) / Trussell, R. Rhodes (author)
Journal ‐ American Water Works Association ; 91 ; 40-49
1999-08-01
10 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Reclaimed Water ASR For Potable Reuse: Bridging the Communications Gap
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2011
|Modeling the Co-Evolution of Potable and Reclaimed Water Distribution Systems
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2014
|Innovative Reclaimed Water Reuse to Provide Potable Water Supply Downstream Augmentation Project
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006
|Online Contents | 2008