A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
How light conditions influence theoretical pelagic to benthic primary production ratios in small lakes
Theoretical pelagic primary production of phytoplankton and benthic primary production of periphyton were modelled for two small lakes in Estonia (Northeast Europe). Although located only 500 m apart, the water colour and light attenuation of these two lakes differed markedly. The Secchi depth (SD) in the clear‐water lake was 4.5 m and only 0.47 m in the dark‐water lake. The total phosphorus (TP) concentrations were, respectively, 15 μg/l and 28 μg/l. An empirical model whose inputs were morphometric, light conditions and dissolved organic carbon parameters obtained from in situ measurements was employed for the present study. The model calculated primary production with a time‐step of 10 min, and a spatial resolution of 10 cm, from sunrise to sunset and from lake surface to lake bottom. The primary production of periphyton and phytoplankton was almost equal in the clear lake, whereas only phytoplankton contributed to whole‐lake primary production in the dark lake because of the stronger light attenuation in the water column. The results of the present study indicated the depth‐distribution profiles differed dramatically between the two lakes. The clear lake had a deep, U‐shaped curve, with the productive layer reaching considerable depth soon after sunrise and maintaining a similar profile throughout the light hours. In contrast, the dark lake production declined rapidly with increasing depth, whereas the profile changed over the day reaching the greatest depth at noon.
How light conditions influence theoretical pelagic to benthic primary production ratios in small lakes
Theoretical pelagic primary production of phytoplankton and benthic primary production of periphyton were modelled for two small lakes in Estonia (Northeast Europe). Although located only 500 m apart, the water colour and light attenuation of these two lakes differed markedly. The Secchi depth (SD) in the clear‐water lake was 4.5 m and only 0.47 m in the dark‐water lake. The total phosphorus (TP) concentrations were, respectively, 15 μg/l and 28 μg/l. An empirical model whose inputs were morphometric, light conditions and dissolved organic carbon parameters obtained from in situ measurements was employed for the present study. The model calculated primary production with a time‐step of 10 min, and a spatial resolution of 10 cm, from sunrise to sunset and from lake surface to lake bottom. The primary production of periphyton and phytoplankton was almost equal in the clear lake, whereas only phytoplankton contributed to whole‐lake primary production in the dark lake because of the stronger light attenuation in the water column. The results of the present study indicated the depth‐distribution profiles differed dramatically between the two lakes. The clear lake had a deep, U‐shaped curve, with the productive layer reaching considerable depth soon after sunrise and maintaining a similar profile throughout the light hours. In contrast, the dark lake production declined rapidly with increasing depth, whereas the profile changed over the day reaching the greatest depth at noon.
How light conditions influence theoretical pelagic to benthic primary production ratios in small lakes
Cremona, Fabien (author) / Laas, Alo (author) / Kõiv, Toomas (author) / Sepp, Margot (author) / Nõges, Peeter (author) / Nõges, Tiina (author)
Lakes & Reservoirs: Research & Management ; 24 ; 18-23
2019-03-01
6 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Hexabromocyclododecane affects benthic-pelagic coupling in an experimental ecosystem
Online Contents | 2015
|Eutrophication and Geochemistry Drive Pelagic Calcite Precipitation in Lakes
DOAJ | 2021
|Understanding the Biogeochemical Impacts of Fish Farms Using a Benthic-Pelagic Model
DOAJ | 2020
|4-2. Site-Specific Models and the Importance of Benthic-Pelagic Coupling
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2003
|The Importance of Food Pulses in Benthic-Pelagic Coupling Processes of Passive Suspension Feeders
DOAJ | 2021
|