A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Quantification of seismic performance factors for self‐centering controlled rocking special concentrically braced frame
Modern self‐centering controlled rocking special concentrically braced frame (SC‐CR SCBF) is capable of reducing structural damage compared with conventional buildings following an earthquake. This investigation quantifies three seismic performance factors, including over‐strength factor (Ω0), period‐based ductility (μT) and response modification coefficient (R), for low‐ and mid‐rise SC‐CR SCBFs. Nonlinear static analysis is conducted to derive Ω0 and μT factors for 12 SC‐CR archetypes. Validity of trial R coefficient is also evaluated using a collapse‐based assessment procedure by comparing adjusted collapse margin ratios with the established acceptance criteria. Results indicate that the Ω0 and μT factors are in the range of 1.39 to 2.29 and 12.25 to 29.0, respectively, and R of 8 is proposed for design of SC‐CR archetypes. A reliability study is also performed to examine the effects of modeling and ground motion parameters on the safety margin of designed SC‐CR archetypes with the proposed R value. Results indicate that the design of mid‐rise space archetypes in high‐seismicity regions with the R coefficient of 8 is more reliable than that of the low‐rise perimeter ones in low‐seismicity regions. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Quantification of seismic performance factors for self‐centering controlled rocking special concentrically braced frame
Modern self‐centering controlled rocking special concentrically braced frame (SC‐CR SCBF) is capable of reducing structural damage compared with conventional buildings following an earthquake. This investigation quantifies three seismic performance factors, including over‐strength factor (Ω0), period‐based ductility (μT) and response modification coefficient (R), for low‐ and mid‐rise SC‐CR SCBFs. Nonlinear static analysis is conducted to derive Ω0 and μT factors for 12 SC‐CR archetypes. Validity of trial R coefficient is also evaluated using a collapse‐based assessment procedure by comparing adjusted collapse margin ratios with the established acceptance criteria. Results indicate that the Ω0 and μT factors are in the range of 1.39 to 2.29 and 12.25 to 29.0, respectively, and R of 8 is proposed for design of SC‐CR archetypes. A reliability study is also performed to examine the effects of modeling and ground motion parameters on the safety margin of designed SC‐CR archetypes with the proposed R value. Results indicate that the design of mid‐rise space archetypes in high‐seismicity regions with the R coefficient of 8 is more reliable than that of the low‐rise perimeter ones in low‐seismicity regions. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Quantification of seismic performance factors for self‐centering controlled rocking special concentrically braced frame
Rahgozar, Navid (author) / Moghadam, Abdolreza S. (author) / Aziminejad, Armin (author)
The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings ; 25 ; 700-723
2016-10-10
24 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Self-centering seismic-resistant steel concentrically-braced frames
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006
|Optimization Based Seismic Design of Self-centering Concentrically Braced Frames
Springer Verlag | 2022
|Seismic Analysis of Concentrically Braced Frame Systems with Self-Centering Friction Damping Braces
Online Contents | 2008
|Seismic Analysis of Concentrically Braced Frame Systems with Self-Centering Friction Damping Braces
British Library Online Contents | 2008
|