A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Modelling of Stainless Steel AISI 316L in Finite Element Simulations
This paper addresses numerical modelling of a rolled, austenitic stainless steel of grade AISI 316L, corresponding to EN 1.4404. The study comprises uniaxial tension tests at a range of temperatures (from –20°C to 200°C) and at two different strain rates (10–3 s–1 and 10–1 s–1). It appears that the material is very ductile and hardens significantly. The strength and hardening depend on temperature, while the strain‐rate effect is minor. The results from the tension tests are used to calibrate two different material models. The first one is a fully parametrized elasto‐viscoplastic model of Johnson‐Cook type, incorporating temperature and strain rate as variables, and including the one‐parameter Cockcroft‐Latham failure criterion. The other model is defined through direct input of the true stress‐strain curve at a given temperature and rate. This model does not incorporate failure. In the validation part of the study, the models are employed in numerical simulations of plane‐strain tension tests on notched specimens. It appears that both models capture the main features of the tests.
Modelling of Stainless Steel AISI 316L in Finite Element Simulations
This paper addresses numerical modelling of a rolled, austenitic stainless steel of grade AISI 316L, corresponding to EN 1.4404. The study comprises uniaxial tension tests at a range of temperatures (from –20°C to 200°C) and at two different strain rates (10–3 s–1 and 10–1 s–1). It appears that the material is very ductile and hardens significantly. The strength and hardening depend on temperature, while the strain‐rate effect is minor. The results from the tension tests are used to calibrate two different material models. The first one is a fully parametrized elasto‐viscoplastic model of Johnson‐Cook type, incorporating temperature and strain rate as variables, and including the one‐parameter Cockcroft‐Latham failure criterion. The other model is defined through direct input of the true stress‐strain curve at a given temperature and rate. This model does not incorporate failure. In the validation part of the study, the models are employed in numerical simulations of plane‐strain tension tests on notched specimens. It appears that both models capture the main features of the tests.
Modelling of Stainless Steel AISI 316L in Finite Element Simulations
S⊘nstab⊘, Johan Kolst⊘ (author) / Faksvåg, Kristian Ullern (author) / Jakobsen, Lars Omland (author) / Clausen, Arild Holm (author)
ce/papers ; 4 ; 1589-1598
2021-09-01
10 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Passivation of welded AISI 316L stainless steel
British Library Online Contents | 2008
|Linear friction welding of AISI 316L stainless steel
British Library Online Contents | 2010
|Dipole heights in cyclically deformed polycrystalline AISI 316L stainless steel
British Library Online Contents | 2005
|Fatigue crack growth in interstitially hardened AISI 316L stainless steel
British Library Online Contents | 2013
|British Library Online Contents | 2008
|