Utilities Pull no Punches in LT2ESWTR Comments: Fid-Bau Portal

Fachinformationsdienst BAUdigital

A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism

Utilities Pull no Punches in LT2ESWTR Comments

Scharfenaker, Mark

This article discusses comments made by leading water utility members related to the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Rule (LT2ESWTR). The comments came from utility organizations such as AWWA, the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies (AMWA), the National Association of Water Companies (NAWC), and the National Rural Water Association. The organizations are concerned that some monitoring requirements are unnecessarily inflexible and punitive and that the proposal inappropriately pushes ultraviolet (UV) disinfection to the exclusion of other treatment alternatives to achieve additional Cryptosporidium treatment credit. The article does not describe the details of the proposed LT2ESWTR.

Access

Check availability in my library

Order at Subito €

Page navigation

Document information

Export, share and cite

Utilities Pull no Punches in LT2ESWTR Comments

Scharfenaker, Mark

This article discusses comments made by leading water utility members related to the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Rule (LT2ESWTR). The comments came from utility organizations such as AWWA, the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies (AMWA), the National Association of Water Companies (NAWC), and the National Rural Water Association. The organizations are concerned that some monitoring requirements are unnecessarily inflexible and punitive and that the proposal inappropriately pushes ultraviolet (UV) disinfection to the exclusion of other treatment alternatives to achieve additional Cryptosporidium treatment credit. The article does not describe the details of the proposed LT2ESWTR.

Utilities Pull no Punches in LT2ESWTR Comments

Scharfenaker, Mark

This article discusses comments made by leading water utility members related to the Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Rule (LT2ESWTR). The comments came from utility organizations such as AWWA, the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies (AMWA), the National Association of Water Companies (NAWC), and the National Rural Water Association. The organizations are concerned that some monitoring requirements are unnecessarily inflexible and punitive and that the proposal inappropriately pushes ultraviolet (UV) disinfection to the exclusion of other treatment alternatives to achieve additional Cryptosporidium treatment credit. The article does not describe the details of the proposed LT2ESWTR.

Access

Check availability in my library

Order at Subito €

Page navigation

Document information

Export, share and cite

Document information

Title:

Utilities Pull no Punches in LT2ESWTR Comments

Contributors:

Scharfenaker, Mark (author)

Published in:

Journal ‐ American Water Works Association ; 96 ; 14-26

Publication date:

2004-03-01

Size:

9 pages

ISSN:

1551-8833 , 0003-150X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2004.tb10573.x

Type of media:

Article (Journal)

Type of material:

Electronic Resource

Language:

English

Keywords:

Regulations , Surface Water , Monitoring , Ultraviolet Disinfection , Cryptosporidium , Utilities

Similar titles

Cryptosporidium Monitoring Under LT2ESWTR

Clancy, J. L. / American Water Works Association | British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004

Round 1 LT2ESWTR Cryptosporidium Monitoring Results

Obolensky, Alexa / Hotaling, Michael | Wiley | 2013

Draft LT2ESWTR Out of the Box

Scharfenaker, Mark A. | Wiley | 2002

News - RIBA bosses pull punches over AA validation

Online Contents | 2008

Strasser, F. | Engineering Index Backfile | 1957