A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
10.1002/eqe.451.abs
The central difference method (CDM) that is explicit for pseudo‐dynamic testing is also believed to be explicit for real‐time substructure testing (RST). However, to obtain the correct velocity dependent restoring force of the physical substructure being tested, the target velocity is required to be calculated as well as the displacement. The standard CDM provides only explicit target displacement but not explicit target velocity. This paper investigates the required modification of the standard central difference method when applied to RST and analyzes the stability and accuracy of the modified CDM for RST. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
10.1002/eqe.451.abs
The central difference method (CDM) that is explicit for pseudo‐dynamic testing is also believed to be explicit for real‐time substructure testing (RST). However, to obtain the correct velocity dependent restoring force of the physical substructure being tested, the target velocity is required to be calculated as well as the displacement. The standard CDM provides only explicit target displacement but not explicit target velocity. This paper investigates the required modification of the standard central difference method when applied to RST and analyzes the stability and accuracy of the modified CDM for RST. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Stability and accuracy analysis of the central difference method for real‐time substructure testing
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics ; 34 ; 705-718
2005-06-01
14 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Stability and accuracy analysis of the central difference method for real-time substructure testing
Online Contents | 2005
|Stability of central difference method for dynamic real-time substructure testing
Online Contents | 2009
|Stability and accuracy of Chang algorithm for real-time substructure testing
British Library Online Contents | 2006
|