A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Reclamation Reform Act “Hammer Clause” Upheld
This case raised important questions about Congress' ability to reshape federal water policy and to decide who should receive federally subsidized water from government reclamation projects in the western states. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a provision of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 that required water districts choosing not to comply with a 960‐acre limitation on land receiving federally subsidized water to pay the government's full cost of delivering the water.
Reclamation Reform Act “Hammer Clause” Upheld
This case raised important questions about Congress' ability to reshape federal water policy and to decide who should receive federally subsidized water from government reclamation projects in the western states. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a provision of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 that required water districts choosing not to comply with a 960‐acre limitation on land receiving federally subsidized water to pay the government's full cost of delivering the water.
Reclamation Reform Act “Hammer Clause” Upheld
Journal ‐ American Water Works Association ; 82 ; 28b-28
1990-11-01
1 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Agriculture , Legislation , Water Policy , Water Supply , Litigation , Costs , Irrigation
AIA's statute of limitations clause upheld
British Library Online Contents | 1999
AROUND THE INDUSTRY - LEGAL TRENDS - AIA's statute of limitations clause upheld
Online Contents | 1999
Wiley | 1989
Wiley | 2000
Constitutionality of Act Upheld
Wiley | 1997