Integrated textile effluent treatment method: Fid-Bau Portal

Integrated textile effluent treatment method

Bapat, Shreyas / Jaspal, Dipika / Malviya, Arti

Textile wastewater purification is a challenging process. Conventional wastewater treatment methods either lack in efficiency, cost‐effectiveness or leads to the generation of secondary pollutants. Additionally, some treatment methods are time‐consuming. The research presented in the manuscript is a blend of filtration, biosorption, aeration, solar energy‐assisted electrolytic precipitation, pH balance, and germicidal treatments with an aim of reducing the suspended solids, intense color, odor, pH, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total dissolved solids (TDS), electrical conductivity (EC), and heavy metal content of textile effluent. Use of environmentally sustainable surface activated biosorbents derived from waste weeds Water Hyacinth (WH) and Parthenium Hysterophorus (PH) as an alternative to commercial grade Activated Charcoal (AC), comparison of adsorption capacities of proposed adsorbents against AC for effluent decolorization, the application of solar energy to run an electrolytic precipitator, and the unique sequential design of various unit processes like coarse and fine filtration, biosorption, aeration, electrolytic precipitation, pH treatment and germicidal UV‐C treatment to treat the effluent are some of the novel methodologies explored in the present study. The invented process provides almost completely decolorized (about 90%–94%), particle‐free and odorless treated water, with the acceptable levels of heavy metals (Lead—not detected, Arsenic—not detected, Zinc—0.5–0.8 mg/L), TDS (1,500–1,850 mg/L), COD (149–169 mg/L) pH (7.1–7.15), and EC (2.5–2.8 mMhos/cm) as some of the important parameters, fitting well within the standard pollution limits. Performance efficiency estimation and statistical modeling were done for the data using the t test and f test. The values obtained were (t = 2.78 and f = 4.99 for treated WH against AC) and (t = 3.00 and f = 5.38 for treated PH against AC at 0.05 level of significance) as an essential part of the manuscript, proving the supremacy of the proposed process to achieve the standard pollution norms. Cost‐effectiveness was an integral factor addressed in the proposed design, recorded a 1.7 USD per 1,000 L of input effluent, which was well below than most of the reported studies. The invented method in the present investigation thus provides an integrated, efficient, eco‐friendly, and cost‐effective solution to wastewater treatment.

Effluent decolorization is about 68% in comparison with conventional activated carbon. The adsorbent was found to be three times more active than activated carbon. COD value decreased from 2,352 mg/L to about 150 mg/L on treatment with the novel adsorbent.