A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Fire performance of brominated and halogen‐free flame retardants in glass‐fiber reinforced poly(butylene terephthalate)
This paper investigates the effects of brominated and halogen‐free fire retardants on the fire performance of glass‐fiber (GF) reinforced poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). Brominated polystyrene was used as the brominated fire retardant, whereas aluminum diethylphosphinate with/without nanoclay as halogen‐free fire retardants (HFFRs). Tests were conducted by using thermogravimetric analysis, limiting oxygen index (LOI), UL94, and the cone calorimeter. Thermogravimetric analysis results show that decomposition of GF plus PBT (PBT + GF) starts earlier in the presence of all fire retardants (FRs). In the cone calorimeter, all FRs reduce significantly the heat release rate (HRR) compared with PBT + GF, with brominated polystyrene achieving lowest HRR primarily because bromine released in the pyrolysis gases inhibits combustion. Brominate polystyrene does not, however, affect the mass loss rate. Aluminum diethylphosphinate alone has significant effects on reduction of both HRR and mass loss rate, which become considerably more when combined with nanoclay. It was also found that the combustion efficiency of the brominated polystyrene compound is much lower than that of HFFRs, indicating that brominated polystyrene has higher gas phase flame retardant efficiency compared with HFFRs because the bromine radicals released during degradation of brominated polystyrene effectively quench the chemical reactions of the pyrolysis gases due to degradation of PBT.
Fire performance of brominated and halogen‐free flame retardants in glass‐fiber reinforced poly(butylene terephthalate)
This paper investigates the effects of brominated and halogen‐free fire retardants on the fire performance of glass‐fiber (GF) reinforced poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). Brominated polystyrene was used as the brominated fire retardant, whereas aluminum diethylphosphinate with/without nanoclay as halogen‐free fire retardants (HFFRs). Tests were conducted by using thermogravimetric analysis, limiting oxygen index (LOI), UL94, and the cone calorimeter. Thermogravimetric analysis results show that decomposition of GF plus PBT (PBT + GF) starts earlier in the presence of all fire retardants (FRs). In the cone calorimeter, all FRs reduce significantly the heat release rate (HRR) compared with PBT + GF, with brominated polystyrene achieving lowest HRR primarily because bromine released in the pyrolysis gases inhibits combustion. Brominate polystyrene does not, however, affect the mass loss rate. Aluminum diethylphosphinate alone has significant effects on reduction of both HRR and mass loss rate, which become considerably more when combined with nanoclay. It was also found that the combustion efficiency of the brominated polystyrene compound is much lower than that of HFFRs, indicating that brominated polystyrene has higher gas phase flame retardant efficiency compared with HFFRs because the bromine radicals released during degradation of brominated polystyrene effectively quench the chemical reactions of the pyrolysis gases due to degradation of PBT.
Fire performance of brominated and halogen‐free flame retardants in glass‐fiber reinforced poly(butylene terephthalate)
Suzanne, M. (author) / Ramani, A. (author) / Ukleja, S. (author) / McKee, M. (author) / Zhang, J. (author) / Delichatsios, M.A. (author) / Patel, P. (author) / Clarke, P. (author) / Cusack, P. (author)
Fire and Materials ; 42 ; 18-27
2018-01-01
10 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
| British Library Online Contents | 2018
| British Library Online Contents | 2010
Study of Interphase in Glass Fiber-Reinforced Poly(Butylene Terephthalate) Composites
| British Library Online Contents | 2004
Natural fiber reinforced technical (bio-) composites modified with halogen-free flame retardants
| DataCite | 2019