Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Life Cycle Assessment of Bitcoin Mining
This study estimates the environmental impact of mining Bitcoin, the most well-known blockchain-based cryptocurrency, and contributes to the discussion on the technology’s supposedly large energy consumption and carbon footprint. The lack of a robust methodological framework and of accurate data on key factors determining Bitcoin’s impact have so far been the main obstacles in such an assessment. This study applied the well-established Life Cycle Assessment methodology to an in-depth analysis of drivers of past and future environmental impacts of the Bitcoin mining network. It was found that, in 2018, the Bitcoin network consumed 31.29 TWh with a carbon footprint of 17.29 MtCO2-eq, an estimate that is in the lower end of the range of results from previous studies. The main drivers of such impact were found to be the geographical distribution of miners and the efficiency of the mining equipment. In contrast to previous studies, it was found that the service life, production, and end-of-life of such equipment had only a minor contribution to the total impact, and that while the overall hashrate is expected to increase, the energy consumption and environmental footprint per TH mined is expected to decrease.
Life Cycle Assessment of Bitcoin Mining
This study estimates the environmental impact of mining Bitcoin, the most well-known blockchain-based cryptocurrency, and contributes to the discussion on the technology’s supposedly large energy consumption and carbon footprint. The lack of a robust methodological framework and of accurate data on key factors determining Bitcoin’s impact have so far been the main obstacles in such an assessment. This study applied the well-established Life Cycle Assessment methodology to an in-depth analysis of drivers of past and future environmental impacts of the Bitcoin mining network. It was found that, in 2018, the Bitcoin network consumed 31.29 TWh with a carbon footprint of 17.29 MtCO2-eq, an estimate that is in the lower end of the range of results from previous studies. The main drivers of such impact were found to be the geographical distribution of miners and the efficiency of the mining equipment. In contrast to previous studies, it was found that the service life, production, and end-of-life of such equipment had only a minor contribution to the total impact, and that while the overall hashrate is expected to increase, the energy consumption and environmental footprint per TH mined is expected to decrease.
Life Cycle Assessment of Bitcoin Mining
Köhler, Susanne (Autor:in) / Pizzol, Massimo (Autor:in)
20.11.2019
Köhler , S & Pizzol , M 2019 , ' Life Cycle Assessment of Bitcoin Mining ' , Environmental Science & Technology , vol. 53 , no. 23 , pp. 13598-13606 . https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05687
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/affordable_and_clean_energy , /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/responsible_consumption_and_production , name=SDG 13 - Climate Action , name=SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production , Innovation , and Infrastructure , name=SDG 9 - Industry , Life Cycle Assessment , Blockchain , /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/climate_action , Bitcoin , Carbon footprint , LCA , name=SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy , /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/industry_innovation_and_infrastructure , environmental impact
DDC:
690
Carbon footprint of global Bitcoin mining: emissions beyond borders
Springer Verlag | 2025
|TIBKAT | 2018
|Life Cycle Assessment of Boron Industry from Mining to Refined Products
DOAJ | 2022
|LIFE- CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE MINING INDUSTRY IN MONGOLIA
BASE | 2021
|