Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Rural mobility and mode choice: Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey
Abstract This article uses data from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) to compare travel behavior in rural and urban areas of the U.S. As expected, the car is the overwhelmingly dominant mode of travel. Over 97% of rural households own at least one car vs. 92% of urban households; 91% of trips are made by car in rural areas vs. 86% in urban areas. Regardless of age, income, and race, almost everyone in rural areas relies on the private car for most travel needs. Mobility levels in rural areas are generally higher than in urban areas. That results from the more dispersed residences and activity sites in rural areas, which increase trip distances and force reliance on the car. Somewhat surprisingly, the rural elderly and poor are considerably more mobile than their urban counterparts, and their mobility deficit compared to the rural population average is strikingly less than for the urban elderly and poor compared to the urban average. Data limitations prevented a measurement of accessibility, however, and it seems likely that rural areas, by their very nature, are less accessible than urban areas, especially for the small percentage of car-less poor and elderly households.
Rural mobility and mode choice: Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey
Abstract This article uses data from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) to compare travel behavior in rural and urban areas of the U.S. As expected, the car is the overwhelmingly dominant mode of travel. Over 97% of rural households own at least one car vs. 92% of urban households; 91% of trips are made by car in rural areas vs. 86% in urban areas. Regardless of age, income, and race, almost everyone in rural areas relies on the private car for most travel needs. Mobility levels in rural areas are generally higher than in urban areas. That results from the more dispersed residences and activity sites in rural areas, which increase trip distances and force reliance on the car. Somewhat surprisingly, the rural elderly and poor are considerably more mobile than their urban counterparts, and their mobility deficit compared to the rural population average is strikingly less than for the urban elderly and poor compared to the urban average. Data limitations prevented a measurement of accessibility, however, and it seems likely that rural areas, by their very nature, are less accessible than urban areas, especially for the small percentage of car-less poor and elderly households.
Rural mobility and mode choice: Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey
Pucher, John (Autor:in) / Renne, John L. (Autor:in)
Transportation ; 32
2005
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch
Automobile Ownership and Travel by the Poor: Evidence from the 2009 National Household Travel Survey
| British Library Online Contents | 2012
Travel behavior of immigrants: An analysis of the 2001 National Household Transportation Survey
| Online Contents | 2010
How Household Roles Influence Individuals’ Travel Mode Choice under Intra-household Interactions?
| Springer Verlag | 2018
Small area estimates of daily person-miles of travel: 2001 National Household Transportation Survey
| Online Contents | 2010