Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Engineering for Whom? Investigating How Engineering Students Develop and Apply Technoskeptical Thinking
College engineering education prioritizes technical knowledge and skills, but there is growing recognition that it must also address the social and societal implications of engineering work. Beyond professional ethics, engineers need to develop broader understandings of how engineering and technology interact with and impact individuals and communities. This study focuses on the development of engineering students’ ‘technoskeptical’ ways of thinking, defined as their ability to think about technologies as more than neutral tools and analyze their complex interactions with sociotechnical systems and values. Students in the study were incoming first-year engineering students who participated in a four-week summer bridge program. The program included a course called ‘engineering design for humans and the environment,’ which foregrounded sociotechnical issues and was designed to promote technoskeptical thinking. To assess students’ uptake of technoskepticism, they completed a pre and post task on which they analyzed the unintended effects of outdoor street lighting. Although students engaged in similar technoskeptical inquiries during the design course, this study found that students tended not to transfer those emergent skills to the street lighting task. The results indicate a need to expand instructional efforts so that students more fully internalize technoskeptical practices and apply them to novel situations.
Engineering for Whom? Investigating How Engineering Students Develop and Apply Technoskeptical Thinking
College engineering education prioritizes technical knowledge and skills, but there is growing recognition that it must also address the social and societal implications of engineering work. Beyond professional ethics, engineers need to develop broader understandings of how engineering and technology interact with and impact individuals and communities. This study focuses on the development of engineering students’ ‘technoskeptical’ ways of thinking, defined as their ability to think about technologies as more than neutral tools and analyze their complex interactions with sociotechnical systems and values. Students in the study were incoming first-year engineering students who participated in a four-week summer bridge program. The program included a course called ‘engineering design for humans and the environment,’ which foregrounded sociotechnical issues and was designed to promote technoskeptical thinking. To assess students’ uptake of technoskepticism, they completed a pre and post task on which they analyzed the unintended effects of outdoor street lighting. Although students engaged in similar technoskeptical inquiries during the design course, this study found that students tended not to transfer those emergent skills to the street lighting task. The results indicate a need to expand instructional efforts so that students more fully internalize technoskeptical practices and apply them to novel situations.
Engineering for Whom? Investigating How Engineering Students Develop and Apply Technoskeptical Thinking
Pleasants, Jacob (Autor:in)
Engineering Studies ; 16 ; 159-183
01.09.2024
25 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Strengthening critical thinking in engineering students
Springer Verlag | 2019
|Encryption activity to improve higher-order thinking in engineering students
Springer Verlag | 2021
|Finite Element Program Generator and the Apply in Engineering
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
|