Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Water Company Not Subject to Regulation by Utilities Commission
A real estate developer sought recovery of all payments for water service for a two year period to the Nob Hill Water Association. The developer claimed that the water association was a public service company subject to regulation by the Utilities and Transportation Commission. The Supreme Court of Washington ruled that the association was not a public service corporation subject to regulation, rather it was a nonprofit cooperative.
Water Company Not Subject to Regulation by Utilities Commission
A real estate developer sought recovery of all payments for water service for a two year period to the Nob Hill Water Association. The developer claimed that the water association was a public service company subject to regulation by the Utilities and Transportation Commission. The Supreme Court of Washington ruled that the association was not a public service corporation subject to regulation, rather it was a nonprofit cooperative.
Water Company Not Subject to Regulation by Utilities Commission
01.05.1987
1 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Illinois Utilities Commission and the Water Works Companies
Wiley | 1915
|State Regulation of Water Utilities
Wiley | 1952
|Regulation of Privately Owned Water Utilities
Wiley | 1961
|Public Utilities Commission Activities in California
Wiley | 1953
|Subject Gateways and their Utilities
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2010
|