A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Water Company Not Subject to Regulation by Utilities Commission
A real estate developer sought recovery of all payments for water service for a two year period to the Nob Hill Water Association. The developer claimed that the water association was a public service company subject to regulation by the Utilities and Transportation Commission. The Supreme Court of Washington ruled that the association was not a public service corporation subject to regulation, rather it was a nonprofit cooperative.
Water Company Not Subject to Regulation by Utilities Commission
A real estate developer sought recovery of all payments for water service for a two year period to the Nob Hill Water Association. The developer claimed that the water association was a public service company subject to regulation by the Utilities and Transportation Commission. The Supreme Court of Washington ruled that the association was not a public service corporation subject to regulation, rather it was a nonprofit cooperative.
Water Company Not Subject to Regulation by Utilities Commission
1987-05-01
1 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Illinois Utilities Commission and the Water Works Companies
| Wiley | 1915
State Regulation of Water Utilities
| Wiley | 1952
Regulation of Privately Owned Water Utilities
| Wiley | 1961
Public Utilities Commission Activities in California
| Wiley | 1953
Subject Gateways and their Utilities
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2010