A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Numerical Modeling of the SR-18 Geogrid Reinforced Modular Block Retaining Walls
The paper reports numerical model details and predictions of the end-of-construction performance for two instrumented and well-documented mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The walls were constructed as part of the highway SR-18 approach fills for a bridge near Seattle, Washington. The geogrid reinforced block face walls were modeled using a commercially available two-dimensional (2D) finite-difference program. The paper provides details on how material properties were selected from laboratory testing of wall components and how the computer modeling was carried out. The paper shows that predicted wall deformations and reinforcement strains were in reasonable agreement with measured data using both linear elastic-plastic and nonlinear elastic-plastic constitutive models for the soil. The geogrid reinforcement was simulated using a nonlinear load-strain-time secant stiffness model and cable elements. The paper compares numerical predictions of reinforcement loads at end of construction with measured values and predictions using a AASHTO Simplified Method, K-stiffness Method, and Simplified Stiffness Method. The paper is a useful benchmark for modelers because it demonstrates what the authors believe are reasonable expectations of model accuracy for Class C predictions of deformations and reinforcement strains for these types of walls when high-quality project information is available.
Numerical Modeling of the SR-18 Geogrid Reinforced Modular Block Retaining Walls
The paper reports numerical model details and predictions of the end-of-construction performance for two instrumented and well-documented mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The walls were constructed as part of the highway SR-18 approach fills for a bridge near Seattle, Washington. The geogrid reinforced block face walls were modeled using a commercially available two-dimensional (2D) finite-difference program. The paper provides details on how material properties were selected from laboratory testing of wall components and how the computer modeling was carried out. The paper shows that predicted wall deformations and reinforcement strains were in reasonable agreement with measured data using both linear elastic-plastic and nonlinear elastic-plastic constitutive models for the soil. The geogrid reinforcement was simulated using a nonlinear load-strain-time secant stiffness model and cable elements. The paper compares numerical predictions of reinforcement loads at end of construction with measured values and predictions using a AASHTO Simplified Method, K-stiffness Method, and Simplified Stiffness Method. The paper is a useful benchmark for modelers because it demonstrates what the authors believe are reasonable expectations of model accuracy for Class C predictions of deformations and reinforcement strains for these types of walls when high-quality project information is available.
Numerical Modeling of the SR-18 Geogrid Reinforced Modular Block Retaining Walls
Yu, Yan (author) / Bathurst, Richard J. (author) / Allen, Tony M. (author)
2016-01-07
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Numerical Modeling of the SR-18 Geogrid Reinforced Modular Block Retaining Walls
British Library Online Contents | 2016
|Numerical Modeling of the SR-18 Geogrid Reinforced Modular Block Retaining Walls
Online Contents | 2016
|Geogrid-reinforced soil retaining walls
Tema Archive | 2005
|Reinforced soil retaining walls by FRP geogrid
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
|Behaviour of geogrid reinforced earth retaining walls
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
|