A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Safety-Based Volume Warrants for Right-Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections and Driveways on Two-Lane Roadways
Safety-based volume warrants for right-turn lanes (RTLs) at uncontrolled major-road approaches to intersections and driveways on two-lane roadways were developed based on traffic crash and conflict analyses. Crash analysis was carried out based on statewide historical data of traffic crashes reported on Minnesota’s two-lane trunk highways. Conflict analysis was carried out using field data and twelve individual VISSIM models involving 350 scenarios to simulate the conflicts caused by right turns for a wide range of conditions. Each scenario involved twenty simulation runs, and each run used a different random seed. Model calibrations involved replication of spot-speed and time-headway distributions observed at field, whereas the model validations involved comparisons between simulated and observed conflicts. Crash-conflict relationships were developed in terms of crash-conflict ratios (CCRs) and crash estimation factors (CEFs). The estimated mean CCRs were and at approaches without and with RTLs, respectively. The values of CEFs, determined as a ratio of CCR to the probability of rear-end/same-direction-sideswipe crashes caused by right-turning vehicles, were between at approaches with RTLs and at approaches without RTLs. The warrant guidelines, in terms of volume thresholds, were established for intersection and driveway approaches separately through benefit-cost analysis. The thresholds for driveway approaches were 10 to 26% lower.
Safety-Based Volume Warrants for Right-Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections and Driveways on Two-Lane Roadways
Safety-based volume warrants for right-turn lanes (RTLs) at uncontrolled major-road approaches to intersections and driveways on two-lane roadways were developed based on traffic crash and conflict analyses. Crash analysis was carried out based on statewide historical data of traffic crashes reported on Minnesota’s two-lane trunk highways. Conflict analysis was carried out using field data and twelve individual VISSIM models involving 350 scenarios to simulate the conflicts caused by right turns for a wide range of conditions. Each scenario involved twenty simulation runs, and each run used a different random seed. Model calibrations involved replication of spot-speed and time-headway distributions observed at field, whereas the model validations involved comparisons between simulated and observed conflicts. Crash-conflict relationships were developed in terms of crash-conflict ratios (CCRs) and crash estimation factors (CEFs). The estimated mean CCRs were and at approaches without and with RTLs, respectively. The values of CEFs, determined as a ratio of CCR to the probability of rear-end/same-direction-sideswipe crashes caused by right-turning vehicles, were between at approaches with RTLs and at approaches without RTLs. The warrant guidelines, in terms of volume thresholds, were established for intersection and driveway approaches separately through benefit-cost analysis. The thresholds for driveway approaches were 10 to 26% lower.
Safety-Based Volume Warrants for Right-Turn Lanes at Unsignalized Intersections and Driveways on Two-Lane Roadways
Ale, Gom Bahadur (author) / Varma, Amiy (author) / Gage, Brian (author) / Gyawali, Sunil (author)
2014-07-16
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Risk-Based Volume Warrants for Free Right-Turn Lanes on Two-Lane Roadways
Online Contents | 2008
|