A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Energetic aspects of turfgrass mowing: comparison of different rotary mowing systems.
Turfgrass mowing is one of the most important operations concerning turfgrass maintenance. Over time, dierent mowing machines have been developed, such as reel mowers, rotary mowers, and flail mowers. Rotary mowers have become the most widespread mowers for their great versatility and easy maintenance. Modern rotary mowers can be equipped with battery-powered electric motors and precise settings, such as blade rpm. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the dierences in power consumption of a gasoline-powered rotary mower and a battery-powered rotary mower. Each mower worked on two dierent turfgrass species (bermudagrass and tall fescue) fertilized with two dierent nitrogen rates (100 and 200 kg ha1). The battery-powered mower was set at its lowest and highest blade rpm value, while the gasoline-powered mower was set at full throttle. From the data acquired, it was possible to see that the gasoline-powered mower had a much higher primary energy requirement, independent of the turf species. Moreover, comparing the electricity consumption of the battery-powered mower over time, it was possible to see that the power consumption varied according to the growth rate of both turf species. These results show that there is a partial waste of energy when using a gasoline-powered mower compared to a battery-powered mower.
Energetic aspects of turfgrass mowing: comparison of different rotary mowing systems.
Turfgrass mowing is one of the most important operations concerning turfgrass maintenance. Over time, dierent mowing machines have been developed, such as reel mowers, rotary mowers, and flail mowers. Rotary mowers have become the most widespread mowers for their great versatility and easy maintenance. Modern rotary mowers can be equipped with battery-powered electric motors and precise settings, such as blade rpm. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the dierences in power consumption of a gasoline-powered rotary mower and a battery-powered rotary mower. Each mower worked on two dierent turfgrass species (bermudagrass and tall fescue) fertilized with two dierent nitrogen rates (100 and 200 kg ha1). The battery-powered mower was set at its lowest and highest blade rpm value, while the gasoline-powered mower was set at full throttle. From the data acquired, it was possible to see that the gasoline-powered mower had a much higher primary energy requirement, independent of the turf species. Moreover, comparing the electricity consumption of the battery-powered mower over time, it was possible to see that the power consumption varied according to the growth rate of both turf species. These results show that there is a partial waste of energy when using a gasoline-powered mower compared to a battery-powered mower.
Energetic aspects of turfgrass mowing: comparison of different rotary mowing systems.
Pirchio, M (author) / Fontanelli, M (author) / Labanca, F (author) / Sportelli, M (author) / Frasconi, C (author) / Martelloni, L (author) / Raffaelli, M (author) / Peruzzi, A (author) / Gaetani, M (author) / Magni, S (author)
2019-01-01
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
DDC:
690
Water Conservation in Turfgrass: Mowing and Fertilization Effects
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
Ground Cover Response to Mowing Height of Turfgrass Monocultures and Binary Mixtures
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004
Colorado DOT Mowing Guidelines
Online Contents | 1998
The day after mowing: Time and type of mowing influence grassland arthropods
| Wiley | 2024