A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Summary: draft environmental impact statement: Ashland watershed protection project ; Draft environmental impact statement: Ashland Watershed protection project; Ashland Watershed protection project
A 13.92/2:As 5x/2/sum ; 24 ; Cover title.; "August 1999"; Includes maps. ; "Enclosed is the draft version of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for actions that would protect the water quality and old-growth forest values of the Ashland Watershed. This EIS is about changing forest vegetation to effectively manage wildfire behavior. Fire once was a natural part of this Watershed's ecosystem and while the past ninety years of wildfire suppression has been well intentioned, it is now problematic. Ironically, because of fire suppression, the Watershed is now at high risk of unnaturally largescale high intensity wildfire. The Forest Service, as the responsible public agency, is faced with the need to take action to reduce the current hazard so that wildfires, when they do occur, can be more manageable for protecting natural resources. This draft EIS displays five options for action in analytical detail for possible ways to accomplish much needed wildfire hazard reduction. Options are designed to be implemented over 8-12 years, and are merely one step toward restoring a healthy and fire resilient ecosystem. A comparison table summarizing the differences between these alternatives is located on page 11-36 of the draft EIS" P. [3].
Summary: draft environmental impact statement: Ashland watershed protection project ; Draft environmental impact statement: Ashland Watershed protection project; Ashland Watershed protection project
A 13.92/2:As 5x/2/sum ; 24 ; Cover title.; "August 1999"; Includes maps. ; "Enclosed is the draft version of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for actions that would protect the water quality and old-growth forest values of the Ashland Watershed. This EIS is about changing forest vegetation to effectively manage wildfire behavior. Fire once was a natural part of this Watershed's ecosystem and while the past ninety years of wildfire suppression has been well intentioned, it is now problematic. Ironically, because of fire suppression, the Watershed is now at high risk of unnaturally largescale high intensity wildfire. The Forest Service, as the responsible public agency, is faced with the need to take action to reduce the current hazard so that wildfires, when they do occur, can be more manageable for protecting natural resources. This draft EIS displays five options for action in analytical detail for possible ways to accomplish much needed wildfire hazard reduction. Options are designed to be implemented over 8-12 years, and are merely one step toward restoring a healthy and fire resilient ecosystem. A comparison table summarizing the differences between these alternatives is located on page 11-36 of the draft EIS" P. [3].
Summary: draft environmental impact statement: Ashland watershed protection project ; Draft environmental impact statement: Ashland Watershed protection project; Ashland Watershed protection project
1999-01-01
Bioregion ; http://worldcatlibraries.org/wcpa/oclc/42408028
Miscellaneous
Electronic Resource
English
Or.) -- Ecosystem management; Ashland (Or.) -- Water-supply , Watershed management -- Oregon -- Ashland Creek Watershed; Water quality -- Oregon -- Ashland Creek Watershed; Water-supply -- Oregon -- Ashland Creek Watershed; Water-supply -- Oregon -- Ashland; Forest fires -- Oregon -- Ashland Creek Watershed -- Prevention and control; Wildfires -- Oregon -- Ashland Creek Watershed -- Prevention and control; Forest management -- Oregon -- Ashland Creek Watershed; Ashland Creek Watershed (Jackson Co.
DDC:
710
Ashland Watershed assessment & action plan ; Ashland Watershed assessment 2007
| BASE | 2007
British Library Online Contents | 2019