A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Fate of Soil Residual Fertilizer-15N as Affected by Different Drip Irrigation Regimes
Soil residual N is a potential factor threatening the environment, but it is also an N fertilizer resource. Few studies have evaluated the fate of soil residual N under agronomic practice. The objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of residual N and its possible influencing factors with different irrigation regimes. Under three N residual situations created by the previous season using the 15N labeled urea, we employed lettuce as the plant material and three lower limits of drip irrigation including 75% (DR1), 65% (DR2), and 55% (DR3) accounting for the field water capacity as experimental treatments. A furrow irrigation treatment (FI) with the same irrigation regime as DR2 was used as control. Results showed that 2.1–4.8% of the residual 15N from the previous season was absorbed by the succeeding lettuce, 78.0–84.4% was still remained in the 0–80 cm soil, and 10.9–20.0% was unaccounted for. After harvest of succeeding lettuces, the soil residual 15N mainly existed in the mineral form. Moreover, the lettuce reuse efficiency for15N was positively correlated with the total residual 15N amount (p < 0.01) and the mineral 15N amount (p < 0.01). The overall results indicated that an appropriate irrigation regime (DR2) was conducive to promoting absorption of residual N by succeeding crop.
Fate of Soil Residual Fertilizer-15N as Affected by Different Drip Irrigation Regimes
Soil residual N is a potential factor threatening the environment, but it is also an N fertilizer resource. Few studies have evaluated the fate of soil residual N under agronomic practice. The objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of residual N and its possible influencing factors with different irrigation regimes. Under three N residual situations created by the previous season using the 15N labeled urea, we employed lettuce as the plant material and three lower limits of drip irrigation including 75% (DR1), 65% (DR2), and 55% (DR3) accounting for the field water capacity as experimental treatments. A furrow irrigation treatment (FI) with the same irrigation regime as DR2 was used as control. Results showed that 2.1–4.8% of the residual 15N from the previous season was absorbed by the succeeding lettuce, 78.0–84.4% was still remained in the 0–80 cm soil, and 10.9–20.0% was unaccounted for. After harvest of succeeding lettuces, the soil residual 15N mainly existed in the mineral form. Moreover, the lettuce reuse efficiency for15N was positively correlated with the total residual 15N amount (p < 0.01) and the mineral 15N amount (p < 0.01). The overall results indicated that an appropriate irrigation regime (DR2) was conducive to promoting absorption of residual N by succeeding crop.
Fate of Soil Residual Fertilizer-15N as Affected by Different Drip Irrigation Regimes
Jingnan Chen (author) / Qiu Jin (author) / Qinyuan Zhu (author) / Ying Xiao (author) / Jingwen Zhu (author) / Xiaohou Shao (author) / Maomao Hou (author) / Fenglin Zhong (author) / Chao Lin (author) / Lin Zhu (author)
2022
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Coupling Regulation of Root-Zone Soil Water and Fertilizer for Summer Maize with Drip Irrigation
| DOAJ | 2022
Modeling of Fertilizer Transport for Various Fertigation Scenarios under Drip Irrigation
| DOAJ | 2019
British Library Online Contents | 1996
Solar drip irrigation system and drip irrigation method for residence
| European Patent Office | 2024