A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Evaluation Circular Failure of Soil Slopes Using Classification and Predictive Gene Expression Programming Schemes
This article presents an analysis of a dataset related to slope stability circular failure cases using the GeneXproTools program. Two models were developed: The first model was utilized to find a classification model that shows the stability status (S), and the second model was utilized to estimate the factor of safety and predict the mathematical model to serve as an indicator of slope stability. The proposed models include cohesion, unit weight, slope angle, coefficient of pore water pressure, internal friction angle, slope height, internal friction angle, and safety factor. The results showed that the values of accuracy and error were 93.1 and 6.9%, respectively, for classification model 1. The relationship between the actual values of the factor of safety and the output of model 2 was an R2 value of 0.96. The models developed were subjected to sensitivity analysis to determine the input variables’ impact on output for the two models. The selected slope locations with different material characterizations were introduced into geox5 software, and the results were compared to those of the two developed models. Furthermore, when the proposed models were compared to the available models in the literature, the results showed that the proposed models in this study performed better than the available models.
Evaluation Circular Failure of Soil Slopes Using Classification and Predictive Gene Expression Programming Schemes
This article presents an analysis of a dataset related to slope stability circular failure cases using the GeneXproTools program. Two models were developed: The first model was utilized to find a classification model that shows the stability status (S), and the second model was utilized to estimate the factor of safety and predict the mathematical model to serve as an indicator of slope stability. The proposed models include cohesion, unit weight, slope angle, coefficient of pore water pressure, internal friction angle, slope height, internal friction angle, and safety factor. The results showed that the values of accuracy and error were 93.1 and 6.9%, respectively, for classification model 1. The relationship between the actual values of the factor of safety and the output of model 2 was an R2 value of 0.96. The models developed were subjected to sensitivity analysis to determine the input variables’ impact on output for the two models. The selected slope locations with different material characterizations were introduced into geox5 software, and the results were compared to those of the two developed models. Furthermore, when the proposed models were compared to the available models in the literature, the results showed that the proposed models in this study performed better than the available models.
Evaluation Circular Failure of Soil Slopes Using Classification and Predictive Gene Expression Programming Schemes
Shadi Hanandeh (author)
2022
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
"Rapid" failure of soil slopes
UB Braunschweig | 2001
|"Rapid" failure of soil slopes
TIBKAT | 2001
|Failure of Steep Reinforced Soil Slopes
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
|Soil Mechanics Laboratory Failure of Slopes
NTIS | 1987
|Failure mechanisms in geosynthetically reinforced soil slopes
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
|