A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The Hunter Valley access undertaking: Elements of a negotiated settlement
Abstract Is Australian transport regulation ready for negotiated access undertakings? On 29 June 2011 the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) accepted an access undertaking from Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) in relation to the Hunter Valley rail network. The ACCC encouraged ARTC and its users (principally coal producers) to discuss and negotiate the detail of the undertaking. At the final stage the parties were able to resolve their differences and put an agreed undertaking to the ACCC. Compared to the undertaking that the ACCC would likely otherwise have accepted, this agreement was for a shorter term and embodied other provisions preferred by the users, in return for a higher rate of return requested by ARTC. The paper discusses the nature and lessons of this experience.
Highlights ► Coal producers and railtrack corporation were able to negotiate an agreed access undertaking. ► Coal producers got better terms and the railtrack corporation got a higher allowed return. ► This experience reinforces and enhances the lessons from elsewhere.
The Hunter Valley access undertaking: Elements of a negotiated settlement
Abstract Is Australian transport regulation ready for negotiated access undertakings? On 29 June 2011 the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) accepted an access undertaking from Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) in relation to the Hunter Valley rail network. The ACCC encouraged ARTC and its users (principally coal producers) to discuss and negotiate the detail of the undertaking. At the final stage the parties were able to resolve their differences and put an agreed undertaking to the ACCC. Compared to the undertaking that the ACCC would likely otherwise have accepted, this agreement was for a shorter term and embodied other provisions preferred by the users, in return for a higher rate of return requested by ARTC. The paper discusses the nature and lessons of this experience.
Highlights ► Coal producers and railtrack corporation were able to negotiate an agreed access undertaking. ► Coal producers got better terms and the railtrack corporation got a higher allowed return. ► This experience reinforces and enhances the lessons from elsewhere.
The Hunter Valley access undertaking: Elements of a negotiated settlement
Bordignon, Stephen (author) / Littlechild, Stephen (author)
Transport Policy ; 24 ; 179-187
2012-01-01
9 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
The Hunter Valley access undertaking: Elements of a negotiated settlement
| Online Contents | 2012
The tees valley water undertaking
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1930
Pelton Round Butte Relicensing: Lessons Learned from a Negotiated Settlement
| British Library Online Contents | 2006
A new rail access charging policy: Hunter Valley coal chain case study
| Online Contents | 2016
A new rail access charging policy: Hunter Valley coal chain case study
| Elsevier | 2015