A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Urban village redevelopment in China: Conflict formation and management from a neo-institutional economics perspective
Abstract Urbanisation is the key to China's modernisation. Extensive urban village redevelopment projects (UVRPs) have recently been implemented in China, with the expectation of generating positive socioeconomic and environmental effects. However, social instability has resulted from conflicts over land and informal settlements. In this study, we investigate the factors influencing conflict levels during the UVRP process. Based on data collected from 439 projects in seven Chinese cities, ordered logit regression reveals that UVRPs with a top-down rather than a bottom-up institutional arrangement are more likely to have violent conflicts. Projects implemented with a bottom-up and villager-funded approach involve lower levels of conflict than those with a bottom-up and private developer-funded approach. Other determinants, including factors related to policies, time, and space along with project specificity, also influence the conflict level during the redevelopment process. These empirical results can inform government approaches to policymaking, thus enabling more positive outcomes for both governments and affected villagers.
Highlights Social conflicts go with redevelopments of urban villages in mainland China. Factors affecting the level of conflict are explored. Data were collected from 439 projects in 7 Chinese cities. Institutional arrangements matter in the determination of conflict levels. A bottom-up villager-funding approach is more socially acceptable.
Urban village redevelopment in China: Conflict formation and management from a neo-institutional economics perspective
Abstract Urbanisation is the key to China's modernisation. Extensive urban village redevelopment projects (UVRPs) have recently been implemented in China, with the expectation of generating positive socioeconomic and environmental effects. However, social instability has resulted from conflicts over land and informal settlements. In this study, we investigate the factors influencing conflict levels during the UVRP process. Based on data collected from 439 projects in seven Chinese cities, ordered logit regression reveals that UVRPs with a top-down rather than a bottom-up institutional arrangement are more likely to have violent conflicts. Projects implemented with a bottom-up and villager-funded approach involve lower levels of conflict than those with a bottom-up and private developer-funded approach. Other determinants, including factors related to policies, time, and space along with project specificity, also influence the conflict level during the redevelopment process. These empirical results can inform government approaches to policymaking, thus enabling more positive outcomes for both governments and affected villagers.
Highlights Social conflicts go with redevelopments of urban villages in mainland China. Factors affecting the level of conflict are explored. Data were collected from 439 projects in 7 Chinese cities. Institutional arrangements matter in the determination of conflict levels. A bottom-up villager-funding approach is more socially acceptable.
Urban village redevelopment in China: Conflict formation and management from a neo-institutional economics perspective
Yuan, Dinghuan (author) / Yau, Yung (author) / Bao, Haijun (author)
Cities ; 145
2023-11-24
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Constraints and conflict in urban redevelopment
| TIBKAT | 1992
An Analysis of Transaction Costs Involved in the Urban Village Redevelopment Process in China
| DOAJ | 2022