A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Estimation and comparative study of J IC using different methods for 20MnMoNi55 steel
Highlights ► Fracture toughness for ductile failure of 20MnMoNi55 steel is estimated. ► Fracture toughness is estimated for both 1T–CT and ½T–CT specimens. ► Comparison of different standards – J SZW, JSME, ASTM: E1820 and Pehrson–Landes method is made. ► Effects of a/W ratio, thickness and temperature on ductile failure are studied.
Abstract Fracture toughness is one of the key input variables to compute critical load of the structural components. The resistance against ductile fracture can be quantified either by the initiation value or by the entire resistance curve. Different standard methods like J SZW, JSME and ASTM: E1820 etc. are mainly used to estimate the critical crack initiation value from the resistance curve developed by the J-integral test. However, the results vary from method to method and are even inconsistent for the same method. Pehrson and Landes suggested a simple method for estimation of the critical fracture toughness by identifying the critical point corresponding to the maximum load on load–displacement curve. In the present study, different standard methods along with the one suggested by Pehrson and Landes are used to find out the critical fracture toughness using 1T–CT and ½T–CT specimens of the material 20MnMoNi55 steel for varying temperatures and crack size. The results are analyzed to compare the merits of the different methods of estimation of fracture toughness.
Estimation and comparative study of J IC using different methods for 20MnMoNi55 steel
Highlights ► Fracture toughness for ductile failure of 20MnMoNi55 steel is estimated. ► Fracture toughness is estimated for both 1T–CT and ½T–CT specimens. ► Comparison of different standards – J SZW, JSME, ASTM: E1820 and Pehrson–Landes method is made. ► Effects of a/W ratio, thickness and temperature on ductile failure are studied.
Abstract Fracture toughness is one of the key input variables to compute critical load of the structural components. The resistance against ductile fracture can be quantified either by the initiation value or by the entire resistance curve. Different standard methods like J SZW, JSME and ASTM: E1820 etc. are mainly used to estimate the critical crack initiation value from the resistance curve developed by the J-integral test. However, the results vary from method to method and are even inconsistent for the same method. Pehrson and Landes suggested a simple method for estimation of the critical fracture toughness by identifying the critical point corresponding to the maximum load on load–displacement curve. In the present study, different standard methods along with the one suggested by Pehrson and Landes are used to find out the critical fracture toughness using 1T–CT and ½T–CT specimens of the material 20MnMoNi55 steel for varying temperatures and crack size. The results are analyzed to compare the merits of the different methods of estimation of fracture toughness.
Estimation and comparative study of J IC using different methods for 20MnMoNi55 steel
Bhowmik, Sumit (author) / Acharyya, Sanjib Kumar (author) / Sahoo, Prasanta (author) / Dhar, Sankar (author) / Chattopadhyay, J. (author)
2012-11-22
8 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Transition Reference Temperature for 20MnMoNi55 RPV Steel at Different Loading Rates
| Springer Verlag | 2019
Incremental cyclic fracture behaviour of 20MnMoNi55 steel at room temperature
| British Library Online Contents | 2015
Stretch zone formation in cyclic fracture of 20MnMoNi55 pressure vessel steel
| British Library Online Contents | 2015
| British Library Online Contents | 2012