A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Buckling analysis design of steel frames
AbstractSteel design codes do not provide sufficient information for the efficient design of steel structures against out-of-plane failure, and what is provided is often overly conservative. The method of design by buckling analysis (DBA) specified in one code corrects this situation for beams, but the extension of this method to columns is only referred to, while there is no guidance on how to apply this method to the design of beam–columns and frames.Beam DBA uses the design code formulation for the member nominal design strengths in terms of the section moment capacities and the maximum moments at elastic buckling, accurate predictions of which may be determined by computer programs. Column DBA is similar, in that it uses the design code formulation for the column nominal design strengths in terms of the section compression capacities and accurate predictions of the elastic buckling.However, design codes do not provide formulations for the direct buckling design of beam–columns, but instead use the separate results of beam design and column design in interaction equations. The further extension to frames is not directly possible, because frames are not designed as a whole (except through the rarely used methods of advanced analysis), but as a series of individual members. This paper shows how the method of DBA can be used to design beam–columns and frames as well as beams and columns. Two example frames are designed and very significant economies are demonstrated when the DBA method is used.
Buckling analysis design of steel frames
AbstractSteel design codes do not provide sufficient information for the efficient design of steel structures against out-of-plane failure, and what is provided is often overly conservative. The method of design by buckling analysis (DBA) specified in one code corrects this situation for beams, but the extension of this method to columns is only referred to, while there is no guidance on how to apply this method to the design of beam–columns and frames.Beam DBA uses the design code formulation for the member nominal design strengths in terms of the section moment capacities and the maximum moments at elastic buckling, accurate predictions of which may be determined by computer programs. Column DBA is similar, in that it uses the design code formulation for the column nominal design strengths in terms of the section compression capacities and accurate predictions of the elastic buckling.However, design codes do not provide formulations for the direct buckling design of beam–columns, but instead use the separate results of beam design and column design in interaction equations. The further extension to frames is not directly possible, because frames are not designed as a whole (except through the rarely used methods of advanced analysis), but as a series of individual members. This paper shows how the method of DBA can be used to design beam–columns and frames as well as beams and columns. Two example frames are designed and very significant economies are demonstrated when the DBA method is used.
Buckling analysis design of steel frames
Trahair, N.S. (author)
Journal of Constructional Steel Research ; 65 ; 1459-1463
2009-03-16
5 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Beams , Beam–columns , Bending , buckling , Columns , Compression , Design , Frames , Member strength , Moments , Steel
Buckling analysis design of steel frames
Online Contents | 2009
|Buckling analysis design of steel frames
Online Contents | 2009
|Inelastic buckling of steel frames
Engineering Index Backfile | 1965
|New method of inelastic buckling analysis for steel frames
Online Contents | 2008
|New method of inelastic buckling analysis for steel frames
Online Contents | 2008
|