A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Irrigation water rates in Mendoza's decentralized irrigation administration
Abstract The cost of irrigation water to the farmers in Mendoza Province consists of three components; canal cleaning by the farmer, a water charge to their Users Association (UA) and a water charge to the provincial Irrigation Department (DGI). The total cost of irrigation water shows large differences when the area of the UA is taken into consideration: farmers in smaller associations pay considerably more than those in large units. This is the case for all three groups of costs. The annual budgets of 31 UA's were analyzed with respect to 19 budget items prescribed by DGI. Several of these items contain a low percentage of the total budget. Further, they make participation of users during the annual meeting in which the budget is discussed and approved unnecessary difficult. We recommend to reduce the number of budget items to 7. Because of low collection levels (average 64%) the UA's spend a major part of their income on recurrent costs like salaries. As a result little is spent on maintenance and improvement of the system, creating dissatisfaction with the paying water users. Thus. a vicious circle needs to be broken about the deterioration of the system, dissatisfaction of users, less participation in the running of the Association and further deterioration. Recent experience shows that the discontinuation of flow to non-paying users in combination with improved water delivery services by the UA breaks the circle.
Irrigation water rates in Mendoza's decentralized irrigation administration
Abstract The cost of irrigation water to the farmers in Mendoza Province consists of three components; canal cleaning by the farmer, a water charge to their Users Association (UA) and a water charge to the provincial Irrigation Department (DGI). The total cost of irrigation water shows large differences when the area of the UA is taken into consideration: farmers in smaller associations pay considerably more than those in large units. This is the case for all three groups of costs. The annual budgets of 31 UA's were analyzed with respect to 19 budget items prescribed by DGI. Several of these items contain a low percentage of the total budget. Further, they make participation of users during the annual meeting in which the budget is discussed and approved unnecessary difficult. We recommend to reduce the number of budget items to 7. Because of low collection levels (average 64%) the UA's spend a major part of their income on recurrent costs like salaries. As a result little is spent on maintenance and improvement of the system, creating dissatisfaction with the paying water users. Thus. a vicious circle needs to be broken about the deterioration of the system, dissatisfaction of users, less participation in the running of the Association and further deterioration. Recent experience shows that the discontinuation of flow to non-paying users in combination with improved water delivery services by the UA breaks the circle.
Irrigation water rates in Mendoza's decentralized irrigation administration
Marre, Mirta (author) / Bustos, Rosa (author) / Chambouleyron, Jorge (author) / Bos, Marinus G. (author)
1997
Article (Journal)
English
Economics of Irrigation Development and Irrigation Rates
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
Irrigation & Water Conservation - Hidden dangers in irrigation water
Online Contents | 2002
Agricultural water-saving irrigation system and irrigation method
| European Patent Office | 2021
COSTS, BENEFITS AND RATES OF IRRIGATION WATER IN ITALY
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
Determining infiltration rates in irrigation border
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1960