A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Selection of the size and shape of tower intakes
Conclusions Minimum local head losses in an intake are observed with a horizontal arrangement of the intake opening sill (ϕsill=0°). In the case of small intake opening heights (t/ $ d_{w} $≤0.25) the ceiling and conical roller gate bottom of these intakes should be inclined at angle $ ϕ_{ceil} $=22–30° to the horizontal to reduce the head losses.For relative heights of the intake openings t/$ d_{w} $≥0.3 the intakes withϕsill≤25° and conical roller gate bottom have the same head losses.To reduce the head losses in an intake withϕsill>25° (when t/$ d_{w} $<0.7) the ceiling and conical cylindrical gate bottom should be inclined at angleϕceil=ϕsill+(7–10°) to the horizontal.
Selection of the size and shape of tower intakes
Conclusions Minimum local head losses in an intake are observed with a horizontal arrangement of the intake opening sill (ϕsill=0°). In the case of small intake opening heights (t/ $ d_{w} $≤0.25) the ceiling and conical roller gate bottom of these intakes should be inclined at angle $ ϕ_{ceil} $=22–30° to the horizontal to reduce the head losses.For relative heights of the intake openings t/$ d_{w} $≥0.3 the intakes withϕsill≤25° and conical roller gate bottom have the same head losses.To reduce the head losses in an intake withϕsill>25° (when t/$ d_{w} $<0.7) the ceiling and conical cylindrical gate bottom should be inclined at angleϕceil=ϕsill+(7–10°) to the horizontal.
Selection of the size and shape of tower intakes
Mikhailov, I. E. (author) / Zolotukhin, V. I. (author)
1978
Article (Journal)
English
BKL:
56.30
Wasserbau
Local classification TIB:
770/6550/8000
Selection of the size and shape of tower intakes
| Springer Verlag | 1978
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2001
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1957
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1946
| Wiley | 1940