A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Selection of the size and shape of tower intakes
Conclusions 1. Minimum local head losses in an intake are observed with a horizontal arrangement of the intake opening sill (ϕsill=0°). In the case of small intake opening heights (t/ dw≤0.25) the ceiling and conical roller gate bottom of these intakes should be inclined at angle ϕceil=22–30° to the horizontal to reduce the head losses. 2. For relative heights of the intake openings t/dw≥0.3 the intakes withϕ sill≤25° and conical roller gate bottom have the same head losses. 3. To reduce the head losses in an intake withϕ sill>25° (when t/dw<0.7) the ceiling and conical cylindrical gate bottom should be inclined at angleϕ ceil=ϕ sill+(7–10°) to the horizontal.
Selection of the size and shape of tower intakes
Conclusions 1. Minimum local head losses in an intake are observed with a horizontal arrangement of the intake opening sill (ϕsill=0°). In the case of small intake opening heights (t/ dw≤0.25) the ceiling and conical roller gate bottom of these intakes should be inclined at angle ϕceil=22–30° to the horizontal to reduce the head losses. 2. For relative heights of the intake openings t/dw≥0.3 the intakes withϕ sill≤25° and conical roller gate bottom have the same head losses. 3. To reduce the head losses in an intake withϕ sill>25° (when t/dw<0.7) the ceiling and conical cylindrical gate bottom should be inclined at angleϕ ceil=ϕ sill+(7–10°) to the horizontal.
Selection of the size and shape of tower intakes
Mikhailov, I. E. (author) / Zolotukhin, V. I. (author)
Hydrotechnical Construction ; 12 ; 147-150
1978-02-01
4 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Selection of the size and shape of tower intakes
Online Contents | 1978
|British Library Conference Proceedings | 2001
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1957
|Rationalised Selection of Scales for the Hydraulic Modelling of Intakes
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1993
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1946
|