A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Convergences and discrepancies between the policy of inclusionary housing and Norway’s liberal housing and planning policy: an institutional perspective
Abstract Inclusionary housing brings together housing supply policies and social housing policies. This article contrasts this combination of policies to a situation where the two policies are kept separate. Drawing on theory of institutional change, the article highlights constitutional, organisational and cultural aspects of inclusionary housing policy and compares this with the features of a policy where inclusionary housing is not adopted. The article seeks to assess similarities and discrepancies between the English version of inclusionary housing and Norway’s housing and planning policy. The planning law and practices, the policy for housing affordability, financial support systems, actors and organisations are assessed and compared. The article concludes that if Norway wanted to implement ICH, it would be possible to customise the planning practices and finance schemes, but new organisations would have to be established. On top of that, there are also cultural divergences between the policy regimes that would need to be regarded.
Convergences and discrepancies between the policy of inclusionary housing and Norway’s liberal housing and planning policy: an institutional perspective
Abstract Inclusionary housing brings together housing supply policies and social housing policies. This article contrasts this combination of policies to a situation where the two policies are kept separate. Drawing on theory of institutional change, the article highlights constitutional, organisational and cultural aspects of inclusionary housing policy and compares this with the features of a policy where inclusionary housing is not adopted. The article seeks to assess similarities and discrepancies between the English version of inclusionary housing and Norway’s housing and planning policy. The planning law and practices, the policy for housing affordability, financial support systems, actors and organisations are assessed and compared. The article concludes that if Norway wanted to implement ICH, it would be possible to customise the planning practices and finance schemes, but new organisations would have to be established. On top of that, there are also cultural divergences between the policy regimes that would need to be regarded.
Convergences and discrepancies between the policy of inclusionary housing and Norway’s liberal housing and planning policy: an institutional perspective
Nordahl, Berit I. (author)
2013
Article (Journal)
English
BKL:
56.00$jBauwesen: Allgemeines
/
56.81$jWohnungsbau$XArchitektur
/
74.72
Stadtplanung, kommunale Planung
/
74.72$jStadtplanung$jkommunale Planung
/
56.00
Bauwesen: Allgemeines
/
74.60$jRaumordnung$jStädtebau: Allgemeines
/
74.60
Raumordnung, Städtebau: Allgemeines
/
56.81
Wohnungsbau
| British Library Online Contents | 2014
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1983
Inclusionary housing in the Netherlands: breaking the institutional path?
| Online Contents | 2013
Inclusionary housing in the Netherlands: breaking the institutional path?
| British Library Online Contents | 2014