A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Uncertainties in PM2.5 Gravimetric and Speciation Measurements and What We Can Learn from Them
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the federal land management community (National Park Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Forest Service, and Bureau of Land Management) operate extensive particle speciation monitoring networks that are similar in design but are operated for different objectives. Compliance (mass only) monitoring is also carried out using federal reference method (FRM) criteria at approximately 1000 sites. The Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) consists of approximately 50 long-term-trend sites, with about another 250 sites that have been or are currently operated by state and local agencies. The sites are located in urban or suburban settings. The Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) monitoring network consists of about 181 sites, approximately 170 of which are in nonurban areas. Each monitoring approach has its own inherent monitoring limitations and biases. Determination of gravimetric mass has both negative and positive artifacts. Ammonium nitrate and other semivolatiles are lost during sampling, whereas, on the other hand, measured mass includes particle-bound water. Furthermore, some species may react with atmospheric gases, further increasing the positive mass artifact. Estimating aerosol species concentrations requires assumptions concerning the chemical form of various molecular compounds, such as nitrates and sulfates, and organic material and soil composition. Comparing data collected in the various monitoring networks allows for assessing uncertainties and biases associated with both negative and positive artifacts of gravimetric mass determinations, assumptions of chemical composition, and biases between different sampler technologies. All these biases are shown to have systematic seasonal characteristics. Unaccounted-for particle-bound water tends to be higher in the summer, as does nitrate volatilization. The ratio of particle organic mass divided by organic carbon mass (Roc) is higher during summer and lower during the winter seasons in both CSN and IMPROVE networks, and Roc is lower in urban than nonurban environments.
Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) are based on gravimetric analysis of particulate matter collected on a Teflon substrate, using federal reference methodologies, whereas compliance under the Regional Haze Rule (RHR) is based on atmospheric extinction, derived from measurements of individual aerosol species. Gravimetric mass can be over- or underestimated because of volatilization issues and water retention by inorganic species, whereas species-specific estimates of mass are dependent on assumptions concerning their detailed chemical composition. Over- or underestimation of aerosol species or gravimetric mass could result in violation of standards or failure to meet visibility goals established under the RHR.
Uncertainties in PM2.5 Gravimetric and Speciation Measurements and What We Can Learn from Them
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the federal land management community (National Park Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Forest Service, and Bureau of Land Management) operate extensive particle speciation monitoring networks that are similar in design but are operated for different objectives. Compliance (mass only) monitoring is also carried out using federal reference method (FRM) criteria at approximately 1000 sites. The Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) consists of approximately 50 long-term-trend sites, with about another 250 sites that have been or are currently operated by state and local agencies. The sites are located in urban or suburban settings. The Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) monitoring network consists of about 181 sites, approximately 170 of which are in nonurban areas. Each monitoring approach has its own inherent monitoring limitations and biases. Determination of gravimetric mass has both negative and positive artifacts. Ammonium nitrate and other semivolatiles are lost during sampling, whereas, on the other hand, measured mass includes particle-bound water. Furthermore, some species may react with atmospheric gases, further increasing the positive mass artifact. Estimating aerosol species concentrations requires assumptions concerning the chemical form of various molecular compounds, such as nitrates and sulfates, and organic material and soil composition. Comparing data collected in the various monitoring networks allows for assessing uncertainties and biases associated with both negative and positive artifacts of gravimetric mass determinations, assumptions of chemical composition, and biases between different sampler technologies. All these biases are shown to have systematic seasonal characteristics. Unaccounted-for particle-bound water tends to be higher in the summer, as does nitrate volatilization. The ratio of particle organic mass divided by organic carbon mass (Roc) is higher during summer and lower during the winter seasons in both CSN and IMPROVE networks, and Roc is lower in urban than nonurban environments.
Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) are based on gravimetric analysis of particulate matter collected on a Teflon substrate, using federal reference methodologies, whereas compliance under the Regional Haze Rule (RHR) is based on atmospheric extinction, derived from measurements of individual aerosol species. Gravimetric mass can be over- or underestimated because of volatilization issues and water retention by inorganic species, whereas species-specific estimates of mass are dependent on assumptions concerning their detailed chemical composition. Over- or underestimation of aerosol species or gravimetric mass could result in violation of standards or failure to meet visibility goals established under the RHR.
Uncertainties in PM2.5 Gravimetric and Speciation Measurements and What We Can Learn from Them
Malm, William C. (author) / Schichtel, Bret A. (author) / Pitchford, Marc L. (author)
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association ; 61 ; 1131-1149
2011-11-01
19 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
Uncertainties in PM~2~.~5 Gravimetric and Speciation Measurements and What We Can Learn from Them
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2011
|Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2006
|Weekday/Weekend Ozone Differences: What Can We Learn from Them?
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2003
|PM2.5 episodes as observed in the speciation trends network
Elsevier | 2004
|Micro-gravimetric measurements over known geologic structure
Engineering Index Backfile | 1962
|