A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The risk-return tradeoff in optimizing regional earthquake mitigation investment
Earthquakes are low probability-high consequence events, regional earthquake mitigation is therefore a risky investment. Despite its importance, the risk-return tradeoff is often not examined explicitly in regional earthquake risk management resource allocation decisions. This paper introduces a stochastic optimization model developed to help decision-makers understand the risk-return tradeoff in regional earthquake risk mitigation, and to help state and local governments comply with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requirement that they develop a mitigation plan. Taking advantage of the special structure of the optimization, Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition is used as the solution method. A case study for Central and Eastern Los Angeles illustrates an application of the model. Results include a graph of the tradeoff between risk and return, quantification of the relative contributions of each possible earthquake scenario, and discussion of the effect of risk aversion on the selection of mitigation alternatives.
The risk-return tradeoff in optimizing regional earthquake mitigation investment
Earthquakes are low probability-high consequence events, regional earthquake mitigation is therefore a risky investment. Despite its importance, the risk-return tradeoff is often not examined explicitly in regional earthquake risk management resource allocation decisions. This paper introduces a stochastic optimization model developed to help decision-makers understand the risk-return tradeoff in regional earthquake risk mitigation, and to help state and local governments comply with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requirement that they develop a mitigation plan. Taking advantage of the special structure of the optimization, Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition is used as the solution method. A case study for Central and Eastern Los Angeles illustrates an application of the model. Results include a graph of the tradeoff between risk and return, quantification of the relative contributions of each possible earthquake scenario, and discussion of the effect of risk aversion on the selection of mitigation alternatives.
The risk-return tradeoff in optimizing regional earthquake mitigation investment
Xu, Ningxiong (author) / Davidson, Rachel A. (author) / Nozick, Linda K. (author) / Dodo, Atsuhiro (author)
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering ; 3 ; 133-146
2007-06-01
14 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
MANUSCRIPTS - Optimizing Regional Earthquake Mitigation Investment Strategies
| Online Contents | 2005
Equity in regional earthquake risk mitigation investment decisions
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
| DOAJ | 2020
Partnerships for Regional Lifeline Earthquake Mitigation
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999
Earthquake Risk Mitigation – The Global Challenge
| Springer Verlag | 2009