A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Why contracts fail: a game theoretic approach to managing urban water
In developing countries, urban water is often provided by public private partnership (PPP). However, PPPs remain highly contentious, with many contracts renegotiated or stalled. Prima facie, this stems from issues in the French model of contract design between two parties – the government and the private operator. Critics point out that in reality, the PPP is a tri-party exchange of promises, services and fees linking the interests of the private operator, the government and the people. We propose a game theoretic analysis comparing a two-party contracting model with a tri-party one, which is tested against a real-world experiment in the water utilities in Manila and Jakarta. Paradoxically, we find that a tri-party contracting model, though analytically more faithful in separating the interest of the government from the consumers’ leads to sub-optimal outcomes. In practical terms, we find that an independent regulator may not generate better outcomes.
Why contracts fail: a game theoretic approach to managing urban water
In developing countries, urban water is often provided by public private partnership (PPP). However, PPPs remain highly contentious, with many contracts renegotiated or stalled. Prima facie, this stems from issues in the French model of contract design between two parties – the government and the private operator. Critics point out that in reality, the PPP is a tri-party exchange of promises, services and fees linking the interests of the private operator, the government and the people. We propose a game theoretic analysis comparing a two-party contracting model with a tri-party one, which is tested against a real-world experiment in the water utilities in Manila and Jakarta. Paradoxically, we find that a tri-party contracting model, though analytically more faithful in separating the interest of the government from the consumers’ leads to sub-optimal outcomes. In practical terms, we find that an independent regulator may not generate better outcomes.
Why contracts fail: a game theoretic approach to managing urban water
Leong, Ching (author) / Qian, Neng (author)
Urban Water Journal ; 15 ; 353-361
2018-04-21
9 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
A game-theoretic approach to urban land development in China
Online Contents | 2008
|Do urban redevelopment incentives promote asset deterioration? A game-theoretic approach
Online Contents | 2019
|Do urban redevelopment incentives promote asset deterioration? A game-theoretic approach
Online Contents | 2019
|Total emission control for managing regional water quality: a game theoretic decision process
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1985
|Managing Cooling Water Contracts and Alliances
British Library Online Contents | 1999
|