A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Goals and persistence of sustainability experiments in divergent urban contexts: urban agriculture and a geodemographic classification in London
This paper critically engages with the increasingly prevalent concept and practice of “urban experimentation” and associated transformations towards sustainability. Too often, the paper argues, urban experiments are assessed from a diffusion-oriented perspective which foregrounds questions of how to replicate lessons from (similar) experiments across (similar) places. This common perspective implies an over-emphasis of unifying visions and rationales at the expense of diverging interpretations of “sustainability”; a neglect of “unsuccessful” experiments and questions of persistence; and an over-focus on certain types of – “green” or “creative” – places while disregarding the emergence and characteristics of experiments in more ordinary urban geographies. To address these issues, the paper introduces a novel methodological approach, combining a metropolitan geodemographic typology with qualitative data on 166 active and inactive urban agriculture initiatives across London. Varying socio-spatial patterns of experimentation are discussed, illustrating how contextual differences at neighbourhood levels matter. The paper demonstrates that neglecting the diversity of urban socio-economic, demographic, and physical contexts may lead to the erroneous suggestion that only places privileged by certain demographics can “achieve” sustainability and points to the significance of experiments beyond narrow ideas of novelty and innovation.
Goals and persistence of sustainability experiments in divergent urban contexts: urban agriculture and a geodemographic classification in London
This paper critically engages with the increasingly prevalent concept and practice of “urban experimentation” and associated transformations towards sustainability. Too often, the paper argues, urban experiments are assessed from a diffusion-oriented perspective which foregrounds questions of how to replicate lessons from (similar) experiments across (similar) places. This common perspective implies an over-emphasis of unifying visions and rationales at the expense of diverging interpretations of “sustainability”; a neglect of “unsuccessful” experiments and questions of persistence; and an over-focus on certain types of – “green” or “creative” – places while disregarding the emergence and characteristics of experiments in more ordinary urban geographies. To address these issues, the paper introduces a novel methodological approach, combining a metropolitan geodemographic typology with qualitative data on 166 active and inactive urban agriculture initiatives across London. Varying socio-spatial patterns of experimentation are discussed, illustrating how contextual differences at neighbourhood levels matter. The paper demonstrates that neglecting the diversity of urban socio-economic, demographic, and physical contexts may lead to the erroneous suggestion that only places privileged by certain demographics can “achieve” sustainability and points to the significance of experiments beyond narrow ideas of novelty and innovation.
Goals and persistence of sustainability experiments in divergent urban contexts: urban agriculture and a geodemographic classification in London
Håkansson, Irene (author)
Local Environment ; 26 ; 736-753
2021-06-03
18 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
Unknown
The spatial targeting of urban policy initiatives: a geodemographic assessment tool
| Online Contents | 2007
GOALS AND CRITERIA OF URBAN SUSTAINABILITY
| Wiley | 2020
Extending geodemographic classification: A new regional prototype
| Online Contents | 2003
Modelling class uncertainty in the geodemographic Output Area Classification
| Online Contents | 2015