A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Can Subsidized Carshare Programs Enhance Access for Low-Income Travelers?
Carsharing programs—subscription-based car rentals—allow users to purchase only the automobility that they need. These programs may benefit low-income travelers by increasing access at lower prices than private auto ownership. Most carshare programs, however, disproportionately serve higher-income drivers. To assess carsharing’s potential to address the accessibility needs of disadvantaged households, we interviewed members of BlueLA, an electric carsharing program in central Los Angeles (CA) that offers both subsidized and regular memberships. We found few differences in how travelers with different membership types used BlueLA. They both used the service to complement travel by other modes like public transit and ridehail. In addition, members cited the benefits of gaining car access without the financial burden of car ownership or the unpredictability of ridehail fares. Neighborhood context, including residential density and the availability of non-automobile transportation options, also increased BlueLA’s appeal. However, due to limited and unreliable vehicle availability, most users did not rely on BlueLA for time-sensitive trips. BlueLA both eased and increased access to destinations outside of the commute and complemented public transit for subsidized and regular members.
Services like BlueLA cannot meet all transportation needs. However, subsidized electric carsharing—particularly targeted to central-city neighborhoods—may address some accessibility needs of low-income households without imposing the burdens of automobile ownership.
Can Subsidized Carshare Programs Enhance Access for Low-Income Travelers?
Carsharing programs—subscription-based car rentals—allow users to purchase only the automobility that they need. These programs may benefit low-income travelers by increasing access at lower prices than private auto ownership. Most carshare programs, however, disproportionately serve higher-income drivers. To assess carsharing’s potential to address the accessibility needs of disadvantaged households, we interviewed members of BlueLA, an electric carsharing program in central Los Angeles (CA) that offers both subsidized and regular memberships. We found few differences in how travelers with different membership types used BlueLA. They both used the service to complement travel by other modes like public transit and ridehail. In addition, members cited the benefits of gaining car access without the financial burden of car ownership or the unpredictability of ridehail fares. Neighborhood context, including residential density and the availability of non-automobile transportation options, also increased BlueLA’s appeal. However, due to limited and unreliable vehicle availability, most users did not rely on BlueLA for time-sensitive trips. BlueLA both eased and increased access to destinations outside of the commute and complemented public transit for subsidized and regular members.
Services like BlueLA cannot meet all transportation needs. However, subsidized electric carsharing—particularly targeted to central-city neighborhoods—may address some accessibility needs of low-income households without imposing the burdens of automobile ownership.
Can Subsidized Carshare Programs Enhance Access for Low-Income Travelers?
Paul, Julene (author) / Pinski, Miriam (author) / Brozen, Madeline (author) / Blumenberg, Evelyn (author)
Journal of the American Planning Association ; 90 ; 537-550
2024-07-02
14 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Indirect Benefits of Subsidized Housing Programs
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1982
|The recycling of [existing] structures for low and moderate income subsidized housing
DSpace@MIT | 1980
|Subsidized vehicle acquisition and earned income in the transition from welfare to work
Online Contents | 2003
|City CarShare in San Francisco, California: Second-Year Travel Demand and Car Ownership Impacts
British Library Online Contents | 2004
|