A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Comparison of three air samplers for the collection of four nebulized respiratory viruses ‐ Collection of respiratory viruses from air –
Viral respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Unfortunately, the transmission routes and shedding kinetics of respiratory viruses remain poorly understood. Air sampling techniques to quantify infectious viruses in the air are indispensable to improve intervention strategies to control and prevent spreading of respiratory viruses. Here, the collection of infectious virus with the six‐stage Andersen cascade impactor was optimized with semi‐solid gelatin as collection surface. Subsequently, the collection efficiency of the cascade impactor, the SKC BioSampler, and an in‐house developed electrostatic precipitator was compared. In an in vitro set‐up, influenza A virus, human metapneumovirus, parainfluenza virus type 3, and respiratory syncytial virus were nebulized and the amount of collected infectious virus and viral RNA was quantified with each air sampler. Whereas only low amounts of virus were collected using the electrostatic precipitator, high amounts were collected with the BioSampler and cascade impactor. The BioSampler allowed straight‐forward sampling in liquid medium, whereas the more laborious cascade impactor allowed size fractionation of virus‐containing particles. Depending on the research question, either the BioSampler or the cascade impactor can be applied in laboratory and field settings, such as hospitals to gain more insight into the transmission routes of respiratory viruses.
Comparison of three air samplers for the collection of four nebulized respiratory viruses ‐ Collection of respiratory viruses from air –
Viral respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Unfortunately, the transmission routes and shedding kinetics of respiratory viruses remain poorly understood. Air sampling techniques to quantify infectious viruses in the air are indispensable to improve intervention strategies to control and prevent spreading of respiratory viruses. Here, the collection of infectious virus with the six‐stage Andersen cascade impactor was optimized with semi‐solid gelatin as collection surface. Subsequently, the collection efficiency of the cascade impactor, the SKC BioSampler, and an in‐house developed electrostatic precipitator was compared. In an in vitro set‐up, influenza A virus, human metapneumovirus, parainfluenza virus type 3, and respiratory syncytial virus were nebulized and the amount of collected infectious virus and viral RNA was quantified with each air sampler. Whereas only low amounts of virus were collected using the electrostatic precipitator, high amounts were collected with the BioSampler and cascade impactor. The BioSampler allowed straight‐forward sampling in liquid medium, whereas the more laborious cascade impactor allowed size fractionation of virus‐containing particles. Depending on the research question, either the BioSampler or the cascade impactor can be applied in laboratory and field settings, such as hospitals to gain more insight into the transmission routes of respiratory viruses.
Comparison of three air samplers for the collection of four nebulized respiratory viruses ‐ Collection of respiratory viruses from air –
Kutter, Jasmin S. (author) / de Meulder, Dennis (author) / Bestebroer, Theo M. (author) / Mulders, Ard (author) / Fouchier, Ron A.M. (author) / Herfst, Sander (author)
Indoor Air ; 31 ; 1874-1885
2021-11-01
12 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
OFFICE PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR BLOCKING RESPIRATORY VIRUSES
European Patent Office | 2023
|PROTECTIVE SYSTEM FOR OFFICE TO PREVENTING RESPIRATORY VIRUSES
European Patent Office | 2023
|Medical protection apparatus for respiratory system viruses and use method thereof
European Patent Office | 2023
|Hypothesis: All respiratory viruses (including SARS‐CoV‐2) are aerosol‐transmitted
Wiley | 2022
|