A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Connection Charge Not Considered an Equitable Allocation of Costs
According to the Supreme Court of Nevada, a water district's imposition of connection fees as a precondition of obtaining new or expanded water service was outside its authority. According to the court, the water district could charge a connection fee only if the fee were used to recover costs related to the properties charged. The court concluded that new customers should not be forced to pay a connection fee that is spend on a facility that may not benefit them or that benefits all members of the systems.
Connection Charge Not Considered an Equitable Allocation of Costs
According to the Supreme Court of Nevada, a water district's imposition of connection fees as a precondition of obtaining new or expanded water service was outside its authority. According to the court, the water district could charge a connection fee only if the fee were used to recover costs related to the properties charged. The court concluded that new customers should not be forced to pay a connection fee that is spend on a facility that may not benefit them or that benefits all members of the systems.
Connection Charge Not Considered an Equitable Allocation of Costs
Journal ‐ American Water Works Association ; 77 ; 112
1985-07-01
1 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Equitable Canal Water Allocation
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2015
|TOWARD A MORE EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF BEACH NOURISHMENT-COSTS
British Library Online Contents | 2000
|Mechanisms for Equitable Resource Allocation When Airspace Capacity Is Reduced
British Library Online Contents | 2013
|Proposal for equitable water allocation for rotational irrigation in Pakistan
Online Contents | 1994
|A Technical Approach to Equitable Cleanup Allocation Between Potentially Responsible Parties
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998
|