A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Permit Not Required for Discharge of Fish Remains
The US Court of appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that a hydroelectric facility's movement of pollutants already in the water did not constitute the “addition of pollutants” to navigable waters. The hydroelectric utility pumps water between its man‐made reservoir and Lake Michigan and fish and other aquatic organisms enter the power generation system during normal pumping operations. The National Wildlife Federation brought this action to preclude the discharge of dead fish.
Permit Not Required for Discharge of Fish Remains
The US Court of appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that a hydroelectric facility's movement of pollutants already in the water did not constitute the “addition of pollutants” to navigable waters. The hydroelectric utility pumps water between its man‐made reservoir and Lake Michigan and fish and other aquatic organisms enter the power generation system during normal pumping operations. The National Wildlife Federation brought this action to preclude the discharge of dead fish.
Permit Not Required for Discharge of Fish Remains
1989-07-01
1 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Permit Required Discharge to Pollutants
Wiley | 1991
Permit Required to Drill Test Well
Wiley | 1989
State's Issuance of Wastewater Discharge Permit Upheld
Wiley | 2005
|