A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Judges Wrong to Require Equal Water Rates
The City of South Boston, Virginia, initiated a proceeding to change its status from city to town. A special three‐judge court was appointed to decide the city's petition. The court entered a final order that permitted the city to revert to town status subject to certain conditions, one of which was a requirement that the new town's water and sewer rates shall be equal for customers of the new town and Halifax County. The City appealed. The special court decision was reversed.
Judges Wrong to Require Equal Water Rates
The City of South Boston, Virginia, initiated a proceeding to change its status from city to town. A special three‐judge court was appointed to decide the city's petition. The court entered a final order that permitted the city to revert to town status subject to certain conditions, one of which was a requirement that the new town's water and sewer rates shall be equal for customers of the new town and Halifax County. The City appealed. The special court decision was reversed.
Judges Wrong to Require Equal Water Rates
1995-03-01
1 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Where Bingham went wrong, getting equal opportunities right and an odd-one-out test
British Library Online Contents | 2002
Online Contents | 2003
IDAHO V. UNITED STATES: TAKING A WRONG TURN IN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE EQUAL FOOTING DOCTRINE
British Library Online Contents | 2002
|